Categories
Blog Updates

[Opinion] TDS & TCS under Income Tax Act 2025 – A Practical Guide

TDS TCS Income tax Act 2025

Mukesh Kabra – [2026] 185 taxmann.com 455 (Article)

1. Introduction – What has Actually Changed?

The TDS and TCS provisions under the new Income-tax Act, 2025 are not just a renumbering of old sections. The structure of the law has been redesigned in a way that changes how professionals will approach compliance. Earlier, we were used to identifying the correct section—like 194C for contract or 194J for professional fees. Now, the focus has shifted to identifying the correct entry in a table.

This shift may look small at first, but in practice it is quite significant. Under the old law, one could remember section numbers and apply them directly. Under the new law, you have to first understand the structure of the table, and then match the transaction with the correct row. This requires a slightly different way of thinking.

Another important change is that the law is now more organised. Instead of having multiple sections scattered across the Act, the provisions are grouped logically. Charging provisions, exceptions, and compliance requirements are placed in separate sections, making the law easier to read as a whole.

At the same time, it is important to note that the substantive provisions—like rates, thresholds, and scope—have largely not changed. The intention is clearly to simplify structure, not to increase tax burden.

From a professional point of view, this means that while your existing knowledge is still valid, you need to re-map that knowledge into the new framework. Those who adapt quickly will find the new law easier to work with.

2. Structure of Sections 392 to 402

To understand the new system, it is useful to break it into three logical parts—charging provisions, exceptions, and compliance. This structure is much cleaner than the earlier law and helps in understanding the flow of TDS/TCS.
Total 11 Section of the Income Tax Act, 2025 are dedicated to the TDS and TCS. A brief of these sections are tabulated for ease of conceptual clarity and reference:

Section
Particulars
392
Provision related to TDS on Salary
393
Separate Section and table for different type of Payments like TDS table for
  • Payment to Residents – 393 (1),
  • Payment to Non-Residents – 393 (2)
  • Payment to Any Person – 393(3)
  • Payments where no TDS is required – 393(4)
  • Details for declaration for Non-Deduction of TDS – 393(6) 
394
Provisions related to collection at sources (TCS)
395
Provisions related to certificates for lower/NIL TDS/TCS
396
Corresponding to Old Sec 198 that TDS is income received
397
Provisions related to application for TAN, Higher TDS/TCS for non-PAN persons, Filing of TDS/TCS Return etc
398
Provisions related to consequences of failure to deduct TDS/TCS.
399
Provisions related to processing of TDS/TCS Return
400
Power of central Govt to relax provisions under this chapter
401
Bar against direct demand. Corresponding sec of Old sec 205
402
Interpretation and definition of word used for chapter related to TDS/TCS like specified person, contract etc.

This structured approach is helpful because now you can analyse any transaction step-by-step. First, check whether TDS applies, then check whether any exception is available, and finally ensure compliance is properly done.

In practical terms, this reduces confusion and avoids the need to jump across multiple sections, which was a common issue under the earlier law.

3. Section 392 – TDS on Salary

The provisions relating to salary have largely been carried forward without major changes. This is understandable because salary TDS works on a completely different logic compared to other payments. It is based on estimated income rather than a fixed rate.

The employer is required to estimate the total income of the employee for the year and deduct tax accordingly. This includes considering deductions, exemptions, and even income from previous employment if details are provided.

One important point is that the employer has some flexibility. Adjustments can be made during the year if there is a change in salary or deductions. This helps in avoiding large deductions at the end of the year.

Another aspect that continues is the choice between the old and new tax regime. The employer needs to consider the option exercised by the employee while calculating TDS. This adds a layer of responsibility but is now a well-settled process.

From a practical point of view, salary TDS will not pose any new challenges. Most systems and processes are continue as they are, with only minor updates required for section, rule and form references.

Overall, Section 392 remains a stable part of the law and does not require much re-learning.

4. Section 393 – Core TDS Provision (Table System)

Section 393 is the most important part of the new TDS framework. It replaces a large number of sections from the old Act and brings them into a single table-based system. This is where most of the real change has happened.

The key idea here is that instead of referring to different sections, you now refer to nature of payment and type of payee. Each sub section is dedicated to specific nature of payee like, Payment to Resident, Non-Resident, payment to any person and like. Each sub section contains a table wherein tables contain different entries specifies the nature of payment, who is responsible to deduct tax, and the threshold limit.

One important thing to understand is that the table does not always mention the rate. Instead, it uses the term “rate in force”. This means you have to refer to the Finance Act to find the applicable rate.

This may initially feel inconvenient, but it actually makes the law more flexible. Rates can be changed through the Finance Act without amending the main law. Over time, we will get used to this approach.

In practice, the biggest challenge will be correct classification. For example, whether a payment is for contract or professional services can change the TDS rate. Since everything is in one table, classification becomes even more important.

Once you get comfortable with the table, however, the system becomes easier. Instead of remembering multiple sections, you just need to understand the structure of one table properly.

Click Here To Read The Full Article

The post [Opinion] TDS & TCS under Income Tax Act 2025 – A Practical Guide appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Vague SCN Based on Non-Existent Audit Quashed | HC

Vague SCN

Case Details: Abbott Healthcare (P.) Ltd. vs. Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab [2026] 185 taxmann.com 471 (Punjab & Haryana)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Deepak Sibal & Lapita Banerji, JJ.
  • Bharat RaichandaniRana Gurtej SinghMarmik Kamdar, Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • Sourabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Brijesh MittalSimranpreet Singh, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee company was issued a show cause notice (SCN) under section 73(1) of the CGST Act, read with the Punjab GST Act and IGST, wherein allegations were raised regarding excess input tax credit (ITC) as per GSTR-9 tables 8A and 8D, ITC mismatches with financials and GSTR-2A, undischarged liability, and short payment under the reverse charge mechanism (RCM). The SCN was stated to be based on a special audit conducted by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG). It was, however, admitted that CAG had conducted no audit of the assessee company. The audit forming the basis of the SCN was, in fact, a CAG audit of the GST department in the State of Punjab. Thus, the SCN was premised on audit of GST department, and not on an audit of the assessee company. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the very foundation of the SCN was factually incorrect. It was noted that the SCN was based on a special audit by CAG. No audit of the assessee company had been conducted by CAG and the audit relied upon was in respect of the GST department in the State of Punjab. Further, it was held that the SCN was vague as it disclosed no basis or particulars for the alleged excess ITC, mismatches, undischarged liability, or short payment under RCM. It was observed that the law mandated disclosure of specific details of tax liability or wrongly availed ITC in the notice itself. Consequently, the SCN was set aside with liberty to proceed as per law.

The post Vague SCN Based on Non-Existent Audit Quashed | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

IGST Refund Denial for Illegible B/L Set Aside | HC

IGST Refund

Case Details: Indorama India (P.) Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal [2026] 185 taxmann.com 161 (Calcutta)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Kausik Chanda, J.
  • Abhratosh MajumdarAvra MazumdarMs. Alisha Das and Ms. Rupomita Ghosh for the Petitioner.
  • Manasi MukherjeeBijitesh MukherjeeTanoy Chakraborty and Saptak Sanyal for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner had filed a refund application in Form GST-RFD-01 seeking a refund of IGST paid on ocean freight in respect of import transactions for the relevant period. The claim was made relying upon the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mohit Minerals case [2022] 138 taxmann.com 331 (SC)/[2022] 92 GST 101 (SC)/[2022] 61 GSTL 257 (SC). The refund sanctioning authority allowed the claim after examination of the application. The department thereafter preferred an appeal before the appellate authority challenging the sanction of refund. The appellate authority allowed the departmental appeal and reversed the refund solely on the ground that the shipping line status was not verified and that the bill of lading on record was illegible. The petitioner thereafter approached the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the appellate authority had reversed the refund on the basis of illegibility of the bill of lading and absence of verification regarding the shipping line. It was observed that the question of refund eligibility required consideration of a legible bill of lading along with the relevant documentary evidence on record. The High Court further held that the petitioner ought to have been afforded an opportunity to place a legible copy of the bill of lading and other relevant documents before the appellate authority. It was held that the denial of such an opportunity vitiated the consideration of the matter on the merits. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for reconsideration after granting due opportunity to the petitioner.

List of Cases Referred to

The post IGST Refund Denial for Illegible B/L Set Aside | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

RBI Adds Mizoram Co-operative Apex Bank to Second Schedule

Mizoram Co-operative Apex Bank

Notification F. No. CO.DOR.RAUG.No.S 9213/07-12-000/2025-2026, Dated 12.03.2026

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has notified the inclusion of Mizoram Co-operative Apex Bank Limited in the Second Schedule to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

1. Statutory Basis

  • The inclusion has been made under Section 42 of the RBI Act, 1934
  • This provision empowers RBI to classify eligible banks as scheduled banks

2. Status as a Scheduled Bank

  • With this notification, the bank is now classified as a Scheduled Bank

3. Implications of Scheduled Status

Being a scheduled bank enables:

  • Access to liquidity facilities from RBI
  • Participation in interbank and clearing systems
  • Enhanced credibility and trust in the banking system

4. Conclusion

The inclusion strengthens the bank’s position within the formal banking framework, enhancing its operational capabilities, regulatory standing, and access to RBI support mechanisms.

Click Here To Read The Full Notification

The post RBI Adds Mizoram Co-operative Apex Bank to Second Schedule appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

[Global Financial Insights] FRC Probes Big 4 Audit – Launches SME Forum on FRS 102

FRC audit investigation

Editorial Team – [2026] 185 taxmann.com 490 (Article)

Global Financial Insights is a weekly feature for the Accounts and Audit Module subscribers of Taxmann.com. It provides you with the latest updates on financial reporting and auditing practices from across the globe. Here is this week’s financial update:

1. Financial Reporting Council Initiates an Investigation into the Audit Conducted by a Big 4 Firm

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has commenced an investigation in relation to the audit of an entity’s consolidated financial statements for the financial year ended 31st December 2023, conducted by one of the Big 4 auditing firms. The decision to initiate the investigation was taken by the FRC’s Conduct Committee in December 2025.

The investigation will be carried out by the FRC’s Enforcement Division under its Audit Enforcement Procedure and will focus solely on the conduct of the statutory auditor(s) and/or audit firm involved. The FRC has clarified that the scope of the investigation does not extend to any other persons or entities.

Importantly, the regulator has emphasised that the opening of an investigation does not imply any findings of misconduct or breach of requirements, and no conclusions should be drawn at this stage. The process represents a preliminary step to assess whether any regulatory action is warranted.

Source – Financial Reporting Council

Click Here To Read The Full Article

The post [Global Financial Insights] FRC Probes Big 4 Audit – Launches SME Forum on FRS 102 appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Adverse Inference for Missing Records – Compensation Over Reinstatement | HC

adverse inference bank records

Case Details: Punjab & Sind Bank vs Ramesh Chandra Semwal [2026] 184 taxmann.com 718 (Delhi)[27-02-2026]

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Shail Jain, J.
  • Rajat AroraNiraj KumarSourabh Mahila, Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • Sandeep Sharma, Sr. Adv., Hunny SinghAnkit Parindiyal, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the respondent–workman was engaged by the petitioner bank as a temporary Orderly on the panel of subordinate staff. He continued to work in a temporary capacity until his services were abruptly terminated without notice, following which he raised an industrial dispute.

The Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT) held the termination to be void ab initio and directed reinstatement with continuity of service, albeit without back wages. It further ordered regularisation of the workman as Orderly/Daftari with effect from the date of termination.

The Tribunal noted that the workman had adduced both oral and documentary evidence to establish his engagement from 1996 to 2003. It was further observed that, despite specific directions, the bank failed to produce muster rolls and attendance registers for the relevant period.

High Court Held

The High Court observed that since the relevant records, including muster rolls, attendance registers and wage records, were in the possession of the bank, and no plausible explanation was offered for their non-production, the CGIT was justified in drawing an adverse inference against the bank.

On merits, the Court held that merely because the workman was engaged as a part-time subordinate (PTS)/Daftari on a daily-wage basis, no exception is carved out under the Act for casual, temporary or daily-rated employees. Once a workman satisfies the statutory requirement of completing 240 days of continuous service, the protection under Section 25F becomes equally applicable.

However, considering that the refusal of employment dated back more than two decades and that the workman was nearing the age of superannuation, the High Court held that reinstatement at such a belated stage would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, while upholding the Award on merits insofar as it recorded a finding of illegal refusal of employment, the relief of reinstatement was modified and substituted with payment of lump-sum monetary compensation.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

The post Adverse Inference for Missing Records – Compensation Over Reinstatement | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

SEBI Extends SSE NPO Registration to 3 Years | Eases Fundraising Norms

SEBI SSE NPO registration

Circular No. HO/49/14/(10)2026-CFD-POD1/I/9380/2026, Dated 15.04.2026

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has reviewed and amended the Social Stock Exchange (SSE) framework to facilitate ease of fundraising and promote greater participation by not-for-profit organisations (NPOs).

1. Extension of Registration Period

  • NPOs can now remain registered on the SSE without undertaking fundraising for up to 3 years
  • Earlier limit 2 years
  • Extension is subject to approval by the Social Stock Exchange

2. Reduction in Minimum Subscription Requirement

  • The minimum subscription threshold for issuance of Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments (ZCZP) has been reduced from 75% to 50%
  • This is subject to:
    1. The exchange undertaking due diligence
    2. Ensuring that funds raised can be meaningfully deployed as per stated objectives

3. Disclosure Requirements

  • In cases of under-subscription, issuers must make appropriate disclosures in the fund-raising document
  • Ensures transparency and informed decision-making

4. Objective of the Amendments

The changes aim to:

  • Improve fundraising flexibility for NPOs
  • Encourage wider participation in the SSE ecosystem
  • Support impact-driven capital formation

5. Effective Date

  • The amendments have been made through changes to the Master Circular
  • They are effective immediately

6. Conclusion

These reforms reflect SEBI’s intent to strengthen the Social Stock Exchange ecosystem, making it more accessible, flexible, and conducive for not-for-profit organisations to raise funds and scale their social impact initiatives.

Click Here To Read The Full Circular

The post SEBI Extends SSE NPO Registration to 3 Years | Eases Fundraising Norms appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

SEBI–DoT MoU to Curb Cyber Fraud via Digital Intelligence Platform

SEBI DoT MoU

PR No.25/2026 dated 15.04.2026

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on 15th April 2026 to strengthen efforts against cybercrime and securities market frauds.

1. Objective of the MoU

The collaboration aims to:

  • Curb financial frauds linked to telecom misuse
  • Strengthen investor protection mechanisms
  • Enable proactive detection and prevention of scams

2. Use of Digital Intelligence Platform (DIP)

  • The MoU enables regular data sharing between SEBI and DoT
  • Utilises DoT’s Digital Intelligence Platform (DIP) a secure system for real-time intelligence exchange
  • Facilitates quick identification of:
    1. Fraudulent communication patterns
    2. Suspicious telecom activities linked to scams

3. Focus on Telecom-Linked Fraud

The initiative specifically targets misuse of:

  • Spam calls
  • Fraudulent messages
  • Other telecom channels used in:
    1. Investment scams
    2. Market manipulation schemes

4. Enhanced Regulatory Coordination

The MoU will:

  • Improve inter-agency coordination
  • Enable faster information exchange and action
  • Support joint enforcement efforts

5. Regulatory Impact

The collaboration is expected to:

  • Strengthen cybersecurity oversight
  • Reduce instances of investor fraud
  • Build greater trust in the securities market

6. Conclusion

The SEBI–DoT MoU marks a significant step towards a technology-driven, collaborative regulatory approach, enhancing the ability to detect, prevent, and respond to cyber-enabled financial frauds.

The post SEBI–DoT MoU to Curb Cyber Fraud via Digital Intelligence Platform appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

IGST Payable on Full Value in DDP Exports Including All Pre-Delivery Costs | AAR

DDP export

Case Details: Arjun Knit Wear, In re [2026] 185 taxmann.com 326 (AAR - TAMILNADU)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • B. Suseel Kumar & C. Thiyagarajan, Member

Facts of the Case

The applicant, a GST-registered manufacturer-exporter, sought an advance ruling in respect of exports made under Delivered Duty Paid (DDP) terms, wherein it undertook responsibility for delivery of goods, including all associated costs and risks, until the goods reached the buyer’s destination. The question was raised as to whether, while exporting goods on payment of IGST, the transaction value should include reimbursed expenses such as ocean freight, insurance, foreign import duties, delivery charges, and other costs incurred abroad prior to delivery, and whether IGST was payable on such expenses. It was clarified that the applicant did not act as a pure agent in respect of such expenses and that all costs were borne and recovered as part of the contractual arrangement under DDP terms. The matter was accordingly placed before the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR).

AAR Held

The AAR held that in terms of the Section 15 of the CGST Act and Section 20 of the IGST Act, the value of supply includes all incidental expenses charged by the supplier to the recipient, including any amount charged for anything done by the supplier at or before the delivery of goods. It was observed that under DDP terms, the supplier bears all costs and risks until delivery at the buyer’s location, and since the applicant admittedly did not act as a pure agent, such expenses could not be excluded from the transaction value. It was further held that expenses such as ocean freight, insurance, foreign import duties, delivery charges, and other costs incurred abroad prior to delivery are intrinsically linked to the supply and are therefore includible in the taxable value for payment of IGST on exports. Accordingly, it was ruled that IGST is payable on the entire value, inclusive of such expenses.

The post IGST Payable on Full Value in DDP Exports Including All Pre-Delivery Costs | AAR appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

NCLT Must Decide Deceased Depositor Claim Despite Succession Dispute | NCLAT

deceased depositor succession dispute

Case Details: Dr. M.A.M. Ramaswamy Chettiar of Chettinad Charitable Trust vs. Chettinad Coal Washeries (P.) Ltd. [2026] 185 taxmann.com 192 (NCLAT–Chennai)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Sharad Kumar Sharma, Judicial Member & Jatindranath Swain, Technical Member
  • S. Ravi, Sr. Adv. & Ms S. Indumathi Ravi, Adv. for the Appellant.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the original petitioner, an individual depositor, filed CA No. 1/2014 before the Company Law Board under Sections 73(4) and 74(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 seeking repayment of a deposit from the respondent company, a private company. The proceedings were subsequently transferred to the NCLT and renumbered as TCP No. 1/2016.

During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner passed away. Thereafter, a respondent individual sought substitution on the basis of an adoption deed, while the appellant trust claimed substitution relying on arrangements under a will, which allegedly transferred movable assets, including the subject deposit.

NCLAT Held

The NCLT allowed the substitution application of the trust and rejected that of the respondent individual. On appeal by the respondent company and the respondent individual, the NCLAT set aside the order of substitution and remitted the matter, directing that the issue of substitution be considered only after the conclusion of testamentary proceedings. Since a testamentary suit for grant of letters of administration based on the registered will was pending before the High Court, no legally recognised heir was available to prosecute TCP No. 1/2016. Consequently, the NCLT adjourned the petition sine die.

Subsequently, the appellant trust sought amendment of the affidavit of assets in the pending probate proceedings to include the subject deposit. The Single Judge allowed the amendment, and the Division Bench affirmed the same, clarifying that the probate court would determine the rightful legatee.

The appellant thereafter contended that the deposit had matured in March 2023 and filed IA (CA) No. 93(CHE)/2024 before the NCLT seeking a direction to the respondent company to deposit or return the amount, claimed to be Rs. 66.32 crores along with accrued interest, to the credit of the probate proceedings. It was argued that retention of the deposit was in violation of Sections 73 and 74 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014, and that there was a risk of dissipation of funds since the respondent individual and his spouse held 99% of the shareholding in the respondent company. The NCLT, relying on the earlier order of the NCLAT and noting that the main petition had been adjourned sine die, declined to adjudicate the interlocutory application and directed the applicant to approach the NCLAT.

On appeal, the NCLAT observed that where a depositor had filed a petition under Sections 73(4) and 74(1) for repayment of deposits and died during its pendency, and where a dispute existed regarding substitution of the deceased petitioner pending testamentary proceedings, the NCLT was still required to determine whether a deposit had in fact been made by the deceased, the amount of such deposit, and the interest accrued thereon. It was further required to examine whether the company was continuing to retain the deposit in contravention of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, and whether such deposit, along with accrued interest, ought to be returned or secured by deposit with an appropriate authority.

The NCLAT further held that any or all parties claiming to be beneficiaries of the estate of the deceased petitioner would be entitled to pursue proceedings for protection of the estate, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in Binapani Kar Chowdhury v. Sri Satyabrata Basu, wherein it was held that the right of a beneficiary to initiate proceedings for protection of the estate prior to grant of probate is not barred under Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

It was also observed that if the NCLT were to conclude that the deposit had been made by the deceased petitioner and was liable to be repaid, directing the deposit of such amount into the probate proceedings would not prejudice any claimant, as the asset would remain safeguarded pending final adjudication.

Accordingly, the NCLAT held that the NCLT ought to adjudicate both the interlocutory application and the main proceedings on merits and determine the fate of the deposit. The NCLT was directed to pass appropriate orders on the interlocutory application independently, without being influenced by any observations made by the NCLAT.

List of Cases Referred to

  • Dr M.A.M Ramaswamy v. Chettinad Coal Washeries (P.) Ltd. [CA No. 1 of 2014, dated 28-10-2014] (para 1)
  • Binapani Kar Chowdhury v. Sri Satyabrata Basu [2006] 10 SCC 442 (para 15).

The post NCLT Must Decide Deceased Depositor Claim Despite Succession Dispute | NCLAT appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source