Categories
Blog Updates

MCA Proposes Simplified Incorporation Rules | Cuts Compliance Burden

MCA incorporation rules amendment

Policy-01/2/2025-CL-V-MCA-Part(2), Dated 08.04.2026

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has issued draft amendments to the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014, aimed at streamlining the incorporation process and reducing compliance burden.

1. Consolidation of Forms

  • Multiple existing forms are proposed to be merged into two simplified e-forms:
    1. E-CHNG
    2. E-CON
  • Objective:
    1. Eliminate repetitive filings
    2. Simplify procedural requirements

2. Rationalisation of KYC and Documentation

The draft proposes:

  • Simplified KYC norms
  • Reduced documentation requirements
  • Streamlined name reservation provisions

3. Removal of Certain Requirements

Key relaxations include:

  • No affidavit requirement for conversion of One Person Company (OPC)
  • Removal of DIR-12 filing at the time of incorporation

4. Flexibility in Registered Office Compliance

  • Greater flexibility in:
    1. Registered office documentation
    2. Physical verification requirements
  • Increased reliance on electronic communication

5. Updates to Specific Provisions

The amendments also:

  • Revise provisions relating to:
    1. Shifting of registered office
    2. Section 8 companies
  • Liberalise integration under SPICe+ framework, including increase in DIN (Director Identification Number) limits

6. Public Consultation

  • MCA has invited comments from stakeholders
  • Last date for submission: 9th May 2026

7. Conclusion

The proposed amendments reflect MCA’s intent to create a simplified, digital-first, and business-friendly incorporation regime, reducing procedural complexity while maintaining regulatory effectiveness.

Click Here To Read The Full Update

The post MCA Proposes Simplified Incorporation Rules | Cuts Compliance Burden appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

K V R Murty Appointed Whole-Time Member of SEBI

SEBI whole-time member

Press Release No.24/2026, Dated 15.04.2026

Shri K. V. R. Murty has taken charge as a Whole-Time Member of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on 15th April 2026.

1. Extensive Professional Experience

He brings over three decades of experience across key domains, including:

  • National security
  • Corporate laws
  • Public finance

2. Previous Roles and Contributions

Prior to joining SEBI, he:

  • Served as Additional Controller General of Defence Accounts
  • Held significant roles in the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), where he was involved in:
    1. Policy formulation
    2. Corporate law administration

3. Regulatory Significance

His appointment is expected to:

  • Strengthen SEBI’s capabilities in regulatory oversight and governance
  • Bring valuable insights from public finance and corporate regulation
  • Support policy development and enforcement

4. Conclusion

With a strong background spanning multiple critical sectors, Shri K. V. R. Murty’s appointment is set to contribute significantly to SEBI’s mission of maintaining market integrity and protecting investor interests.

Click Here To Read The Full Press Release

The post K V R Murty Appointed Whole-Time Member of SEBI appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing Set Aside | HC

GST registration cancellation

Case Details: Arup Sarkar vs. State of West Bengal - [2026] 185 taxmann.com 506 (Calcutta)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.
  • Bikramaditya GhoshRajeev ParikMayank BhandariMs Ved RaiDebojyoti BasakVivek Saha for the Petitioner.
  • Pretom DasBikash Singha for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner challenged the cancellation of his GST registration, which had been effected solely on the ground of non-filing of returns. It was submitted that due to such cancellation, the petitioner was effectively barred from carrying on his business operations, as he could neither issue tax invoices nor undertake regular commercial activities. The petitioner emphasised that there was no allegation from the department regarding any tax evasion, fraud, or adoption of dubious practices, and that the cancellation was causing severe financial hardship while also adversely impacting overall tax collection. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the power of cancellation of registration must be exercised judiciously and not in a mechanical manner as per Section 29, read with Section 30 of the CGST Act and West Bengal GST Act. It was observed that where the default is limited to non-filing of returns, and there is no allegation of tax evasion, cancellation of registration would be counterproductive, as it prevents the assessee from carrying on business and consequently affects the flow of revenue to the exchequer. The Court emphasised the need for a pragmatic approach and relied on earlier judicial precedent to hold that restoration of registration should be permitted in such cases. Accordingly, the impugned cancellation order was set aside, and the authorities were directed to restore the registration, subject to the condition that the petitioner file all pending returns and discharge the entire tax liability, including applicable interest, fines, and penalties, within the stipulated time frame.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

The post GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing Set Aside | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

ESI Not Applicable to New Firms with Fewer Than 10 Employees | HC

ESI applicability to new firms

Case Details: PGP & SONS vs. REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION - [2026] 185 taxmann.com 75 (Kerala)[30-03-2026]

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Sathish Ninan & P. Krishna Kumar, JJ.
  • K. John Mathai, Adv. & E.K. Nandakumar, Sr. Adv. for the Appellant.
  • T.V. Ajayakumar, Adv. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the erstwhile firm P.G. Parameswara Iyer and Sons was engaged in the trading of consumer goods, tea and coffee, and was covered under the ESI Act. Upon the death of the founder, his three sons decided to dissolve the partnership to facilitate partition of family properties.

The business of the erstwhile firm was discontinued on 31.03.2001. Thereafter, one son, along with his children, formed M/s P.G. Parameswara Iyer and Company at Kozhikode, while another son, along with his children, formed M/s PGP and Sons at Palakkad. Both newly constituted firms carried on the same line of business and each employed fewer than ten persons. The ESI authorities contended that both firms were covered under the Act.

M/s P.G. Parameswara Iyer and Company approached the ESI Court, Kozhikode, seeking a declaration of non-coverage with effect from 01.04.2001. The claim was allowed, with the Court holding that it was an independent establishment and, having fewer than ten employees, was not covered under the Act. However, M/s PGP and Sons approached the ESI Court, Palakkad for similar relief, which was rejected on the ground that it was a continuation of the earlier establishment and hence covered under the Act.

Aggrieved, the ESI Corporation and the respective applicants filed appeals. It was noted that the partners of the two new firms were different, the firm names were distinct, and fresh capital had been introduced in each partnership. All employees of the erstwhile firm were paid terminal benefits upon closure. New bank accounts were opened, and fresh registrations were obtained under the Sales Tax, Employees Provident Fund, and Labour laws with effect from 01.04.2001. New PAN cards were also obtained. The partnership deeds provided for re-employment of workers, and applications for registration were submitted simultaneously to the Registrar of Firms, with due intimation of the new constitution.

High Court Held

The High Court observed that, upon execution of the new partnership deeds and commencement of business thereunder, it must be inferred that the erstwhile firm stood dissolved. Since the old and new entities could not co-exist, dissolution could be implied from the surrounding circumstances.

Accordingly, the mere fact that a formal dissolution deed was executed only on 25.09.2002 would not imply that the erstwhile firm continued until that date. The High Court therefore held that both applicant firms were independent establishments and were not covered under the ESI Act.

The post ESI Not Applicable to New Firms with Fewer Than 10 Employees | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Appellate Authority Must Pass Reasoned GST Orders Despite Absence | HC

GST appellate authority

Case Details: SFC Global Commodity (P.) Ltd. vs. Union of India - [2026] 185 taxmann.com 435 (Gujarat)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • A.S. Supehia & Pranav Trivedi, JJ.
  • Hardik P. Modh for the Petitioner.
  • Ms Tanushree Shrimal, Asstt. Govt. Pleader & Ms Hetal G. Patel, Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner and the subsequent dismissal of its appeal by the first appellate authority. It had specifically contended in its appeal memo that it had furnished timely replies to RFT-08 notices and had expressly requested a personal hearing, which was not granted. It was further argued that the delay in filing refund application in RFT-01 was attributable to system-related constraints and not due to any lapse on its part. Despite placing these detailed factual and legal submissions on record, the appellate authority dismissed the appeal solely on the ground of non-appearance, without examining the merits of the case or addressing the issues raised in the written submissions. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that, under Section 107 read with Section 75 of the CGST Act and the Gujarat GST Act, quasi-judicial authorities are obligated to pass a reasoned and speaking order addressing the contentions raised by the assessee. It emphasized that mere non-appearance of the appellant cannot justify summary dismissal of an appeal, especially where detailed written submissions are already on record. It noted that the appellate authority failed to consider key issues such as denial of personal hearing and system-driven delays, thereby violating principles of natural justice. Accordingly, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication with a direction to grant an opportunity of hearing.

The post Appellate Authority Must Pass Reasoned GST Orders Despite Absence | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

SEBI–FIU-IND MoU to Boost Coordination Against Money Laundering

SEBI FIU-IND MoU

Press Release No.26/2026, Dated 16.04.2026

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Financial Intelligence Unit – India (FIU-IND) to enhance cooperation in implementing the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and related rules.

1. Objective of the MoU

The collaboration aims to:

  • Strengthen anti-money laundering (AML) enforcement in the securities market
  • Improve detection and prevention of financial crimes
  • Enhance regulatory coordination and intelligence sharing

2. Data Sharing and Information Exchange

  • The MoU enables regular sharing of data and information between SEBI and FIU-IND
  • Facilitates:
    1. Identification of suspicious transactions
    2. Tracking of illicit financial flows
    3. Better risk assessment and monitoring

3. Strengthening Regulatory Oversight

The arrangement will:

  • Improve coordination between financial and market regulators
  • Enable timely and effective action against fraud
  • Support compliance with PMLA obligations by market participants

4. Impact on Securities Market

The initiative is expected to:

  • Enhance transparency and integrity of the securities market
  • Reduce instances of money laundering and fraud
  • Strengthen investor confidence

5. Conclusion

The SEBI–FIU MoU marks a significant step towards a collaborative, intelligence-driven regulatory approach, reinforcing India’s efforts to combat financial crime and ensure a robust compliance ecosystem in the securities market.

Click Here To Read The Full Press Release

The post SEBI–FIU-IND MoU to Boost Coordination Against Money Laundering appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

SEBI Revises Fit & Proper Criteria Under Intermediaries Regulations

SEBI intermediaries disclosure timelines

Notification F. No. SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2026/300, Dated 15.04.2026

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has notified amendments to the SEBI (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008, introducing key clarifications and strengthening compliance requirements.

1. Clarification on Interpretation of “Days”

  • A new clause (ea) in Regulation 2 has been inserted
  • It clarifies that the term “days” shall mean calendar days

This removes ambiguity in timelines prescribed under the regulations.

2. Changes in Fit and Proper Person Criteria

Amendments have been made to Schedule II, which deals with the ‘fit and proper person’ criteria, including:

  • Revision of disqualification events
  • Updates to ensure:
    1. Better screening of intermediaries
    2. Enhanced regulatory integrity and governance

3. Introduction of Disclosure Requirement (Clause 3A)

  • A new Clause 3A has been introduced
  • It mandates:
    1. Disclosure of specified events
    2. Within prescribed timelines

This strengthens transparency and ongoing compliance monitoring.

4. Effective Date

  • The amendments are effective immediately

5. Conclusion

These changes reinforce SEBI’s focus on clarity, transparency, and stricter governance standards, ensuring that intermediaries operate within a robust and accountable regulatory framework.

Click Here To Read The Full Notification

The post SEBI Revises Fit & Proper Criteria Under Intermediaries Regulations appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

ICAI Constitutes Expert Panel to Address Audit-Related Queries

ICAI expert panel audit queries

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), through its Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AASB), has announced the constitution of an “Expert Panel” to provide technical guidance to members on issues relating to statutory audit and allied auditing aspects. This initiative, continuing the practice followed over the past four years, is aimed at supporting auditors in navigating the increasingly complex business and regulatory environment marked by the rise of start-ups, public listings, and evolving reporting requirements.

The Panel, will be operational from 16th April 2026 to 30th September 2026. During this period, members can submit their audit-related queries via email to seek expert guidance on practical issues encountered during audit engagements.

ICAI has emphasised that queries should be concise yet factually complete, while strictly maintaining client confidentiality by avoiding disclosure of entity names. Members are also advised against submitting duplicate queries or repeated follow-ups on the same matter. The mechanism is intended to serve as a guiding aid, and members are expected to exercise professional judgment in applying the responses to their specific engagements.

It is clarified that the responses provided by the Expert Panel will reflect the personal views of the experts and shall not be construed as official positions of the AASB or ICAI. Accordingly, neither the Institute nor the Panel members assume responsibility for actions taken based on such guidance. Further, such views are not admissible as evidence in judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings. The AASB also reserves the discretion to decline responding to any query without assigning reasons, depending on its nature.

Click here to access the announcement

Click Here To Read The Full Story

The post ICAI Constitutes Expert Panel to Address Audit-Related Queries appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Bogus Share Premium Property Attachment Upheld Despite SCN Error

bogus share premium property

Case Details: Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (BPU-2) vs. Brook Multimedia (P.) Ltd. [2026] 185 taxmann.com 443 (SAFEMA-New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Gopal Chandra Mishra & Rajesh Malhotra, Member
  • Manmeet S. Arora, SPP for the Appellant.
  • Ashwani TanejaAshish TandonMs Gunjan Chauhan, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The appellant-assessing officer (AO) filed the instant appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority (AA) revoking the provisional attachment order (PAO). The assessee was a shell company. During the assessment proceedings, it was found that the assessee received share capital at a premium. Subsequently, the assessee purchased an immovable property from such share premium. The assessee reported the acquisition of such property in its income tax return.

The AO provisionally attached such property as the source of share capital, which was not genuine. Further, the matter was referred to the AA, who revoked the attachment order. Aggrieved AO filed the instant appeal before the Tribunal.

ITAT Held

The Tribunal held that the assessee was incorporated on 30.11.2010. Within a year of its incorporation, the assessee received share capital at a premium. The assessee purchased an immovable property from such share premium. The following year, the assessee reported the acquisition of such property in its income tax return.

It was clear that the assessee was a shell company. It was never involved in any business activity. The entire share capital was received from a single source at a premium. Further, it had no income-generating activities and thus possessed all the principal characteristics associated with a shell company.

The fact that wrong property was mentioned in the Show Cause Notice (on account of misdeclaration in the ITR for the year 2019-20), the attachment proceedings cannot be set aside qua the share premium of Rs. 1,96,80,000/- transformed in the form of any investment/loan, as the infusion of bogus share premium was specifically mentioned in SCN which was utilized for purchasing the property.

Accordingly, the AO was permitted to attach the benami property of the assessee to the extent of Rs. 1,96,80,000 infused in the form of the bogus share premium obtained at the rate of Rs. 240 per share, without any basis.

The post Bogus Share Premium Property Attachment Upheld Despite SCN Error appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

[Opinion] TDS & TCS under Income Tax Act 2025 – A Practical Guide

TDS TCS Income tax Act 2025

Mukesh Kabra – [2026] 185 taxmann.com 455 (Article)

1. Introduction – What has Actually Changed?

The TDS and TCS provisions under the new Income-tax Act, 2025 are not just a renumbering of old sections. The structure of the law has been redesigned in a way that changes how professionals will approach compliance. Earlier, we were used to identifying the correct section—like 194C for contract or 194J for professional fees. Now, the focus has shifted to identifying the correct entry in a table.

This shift may look small at first, but in practice it is quite significant. Under the old law, one could remember section numbers and apply them directly. Under the new law, you have to first understand the structure of the table, and then match the transaction with the correct row. This requires a slightly different way of thinking.

Another important change is that the law is now more organised. Instead of having multiple sections scattered across the Act, the provisions are grouped logically. Charging provisions, exceptions, and compliance requirements are placed in separate sections, making the law easier to read as a whole.

At the same time, it is important to note that the substantive provisions—like rates, thresholds, and scope—have largely not changed. The intention is clearly to simplify structure, not to increase tax burden.

From a professional point of view, this means that while your existing knowledge is still valid, you need to re-map that knowledge into the new framework. Those who adapt quickly will find the new law easier to work with.

2. Structure of Sections 392 to 402

To understand the new system, it is useful to break it into three logical parts—charging provisions, exceptions, and compliance. This structure is much cleaner than the earlier law and helps in understanding the flow of TDS/TCS.
Total 11 Section of the Income Tax Act, 2025 are dedicated to the TDS and TCS. A brief of these sections are tabulated for ease of conceptual clarity and reference:

Section
Particulars
392
Provision related to TDS on Salary
393
Separate Section and table for different type of Payments like TDS table for
  • Payment to Residents – 393 (1),
  • Payment to Non-Residents – 393 (2)
  • Payment to Any Person – 393(3)
  • Payments where no TDS is required – 393(4)
  • Details for declaration for Non-Deduction of TDS – 393(6) 
394
Provisions related to collection at sources (TCS)
395
Provisions related to certificates for lower/NIL TDS/TCS
396
Corresponding to Old Sec 198 that TDS is income received
397
Provisions related to application for TAN, Higher TDS/TCS for non-PAN persons, Filing of TDS/TCS Return etc
398
Provisions related to consequences of failure to deduct TDS/TCS.
399
Provisions related to processing of TDS/TCS Return
400
Power of central Govt to relax provisions under this chapter
401
Bar against direct demand. Corresponding sec of Old sec 205
402
Interpretation and definition of word used for chapter related to TDS/TCS like specified person, contract etc.

This structured approach is helpful because now you can analyse any transaction step-by-step. First, check whether TDS applies, then check whether any exception is available, and finally ensure compliance is properly done.

In practical terms, this reduces confusion and avoids the need to jump across multiple sections, which was a common issue under the earlier law.

3. Section 392 – TDS on Salary

The provisions relating to salary have largely been carried forward without major changes. This is understandable because salary TDS works on a completely different logic compared to other payments. It is based on estimated income rather than a fixed rate.

The employer is required to estimate the total income of the employee for the year and deduct tax accordingly. This includes considering deductions, exemptions, and even income from previous employment if details are provided.

One important point is that the employer has some flexibility. Adjustments can be made during the year if there is a change in salary or deductions. This helps in avoiding large deductions at the end of the year.

Another aspect that continues is the choice between the old and new tax regime. The employer needs to consider the option exercised by the employee while calculating TDS. This adds a layer of responsibility but is now a well-settled process.

From a practical point of view, salary TDS will not pose any new challenges. Most systems and processes are continue as they are, with only minor updates required for section, rule and form references.

Overall, Section 392 remains a stable part of the law and does not require much re-learning.

4. Section 393 – Core TDS Provision (Table System)

Section 393 is the most important part of the new TDS framework. It replaces a large number of sections from the old Act and brings them into a single table-based system. This is where most of the real change has happened.

The key idea here is that instead of referring to different sections, you now refer to nature of payment and type of payee. Each sub section is dedicated to specific nature of payee like, Payment to Resident, Non-Resident, payment to any person and like. Each sub section contains a table wherein tables contain different entries specifies the nature of payment, who is responsible to deduct tax, and the threshold limit.

One important thing to understand is that the table does not always mention the rate. Instead, it uses the term “rate in force”. This means you have to refer to the Finance Act to find the applicable rate.

This may initially feel inconvenient, but it actually makes the law more flexible. Rates can be changed through the Finance Act without amending the main law. Over time, we will get used to this approach.

In practice, the biggest challenge will be correct classification. For example, whether a payment is for contract or professional services can change the TDS rate. Since everything is in one table, classification becomes even more important.

Once you get comfortable with the table, however, the system becomes easier. Instead of remembering multiple sections, you just need to understand the structure of one table properly.

Click Here To Read The Full Article

The post [Opinion] TDS & TCS under Income Tax Act 2025 – A Practical Guide appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source