Categories
Blog Updates

HC Allows Delay Condonation Due to Management Dispute

condonation delay return filing

Case Details: Teksons (P.) Ltd. vs. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai - [2026] 185 taxmann.com 814 (Bombay)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • B. P. Colabawalla & Firdosh P. Pooniwalla, JJ.
  • K. GopalMs Neha Paranjpe, Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • Vikas T. Khanchandani, Adv. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

Assessee-company filed an application under section 119(2)(b) seeking condonation of the delay of 169 days in filing the return. The delay was caused by disputes between directors, which led to NCLT proceedings and delayed the finalisation of financial statements. The revised financial statements were approved, after which the audit report was filed.

However, the time limits under sections 139(1) and 139(4) had already expired, preventing them from filing the return. The Chief Commissioner rejected the application, holding that the assessee had not established “genuine hardship” or reasonable cause for the delay. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee filed a writ petition to the Bombay High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the assessee had been regularly filing the return of income for many years. Except for the year under consideration, there was no default on the part of the assessee in filing the return of income in any earlier or subsequent assessment years. The delay occurred due to disagreements among the company’s Directors regarding certain financial statement items and other management issues.

The same resulted in proceedings before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The revised financial statements were approved by a majority of the Directors in a board meeting held on 25.02.2023. With the approval of all the Directors of the Company, the tax audit report was uploaded and submitted to the Income Tax Department on 29.03.2023, with a delay of 172 days. The audit report was filed within the time prescribed under section 139(4) of the Act. However, no returns could be filed, as the time limit for filing under sections 139(1) and 139(4) had expired.

Thus, after considering the reasons for the delay, including the disputes between the Directors of the assessee company, the delay in filing the return ought to be condoned.

The post HC Allows Delay Condonation Due to Management Dispute appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

No Detention by Transit State Officers Without Jurisdiction | HC

GST transit state detention

Case Details: Golden Traders vs. Deputy Assistant Commissioner of State Tax - [2026] 185 taxmann.com 569 (Andhra Pradesh)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • R. Raghunandan Rao & T.C.D. Sekhar, JJ.
  • P. Girish KumarV. RaghuramanM.V.J.K. KumarPasupuleti Venkata PrasadSameer GuptaAkula Vamsi Krishna, Ld. Counsels for the Petitioner.
  • R. Kalyan Chakravarthy, Ld. Govt. Pleader for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioners, engaged in inter-state trade and transportation of goods, challenged interception proceedings initiated by officers during transit. The officers detained the consignments invoking the Section 129 of the CGST Act, and in several instances proceeded to confiscation under Section 130, contending that they were competent ‘proper officers’ even in respect of goods merely passing through the State. It was submitted that except in one case alleging absence of invoices and e-way bills, the consignments were accompanied by requisite statutory documents, and that the proceedings were nevertheless initiated on grounds such as alleged undervaluation, mismatch in description, and minor quantity variations. The petitioners contended that, even if assumed, such discrepancies did not indicate any intent to evade tax. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the cross-empowerment mechanism under Section 6 of the CGST Act, read with Section 4 of the IGST Act, applied only in respect of taxpayers administratively assigned to the respective state authorities, and not to inter-state consignments merely transiting through a state without any tax revenue allocation. It further held that officers of an intermediary State could not assume jurisdiction to levy penalties, appropriate goods, or initiate confiscation proceedings under Section 129 or Section 130 for consignments originating and terminating outside the State. The Court observed that the role of such officers was limited to verifying documents and forwarding any discrepancies to the proper jurisdictional officers of the consignor or consignee, and that they could not undertake valuation or assessment at the interception stage. It was further held that detention or confiscation based on alleged undervaluation, description mismatch, or minor quantity variation was impermissible. Consequently, the proceedings were set aside.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

The post No Detention by Transit State Officers Without Jurisdiction | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

SEBI Introduces Fast-Track PPM Processing for AIFs

SEBI AIF fast track PPM

Press Release No.29/2026, Dated: 30.04.2026

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has reviewed the procedure for processing Placement Memorandum (PPM) of Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) and introduced a Fast-Track Mechanism as an Ease of Doing Business initiative.

1. Key Relaxation Introduced

  • AIFs can now:
    1. Proceed with the launch of non-LVF schemes
    2. Circulate the PPM to investors for fund mobilisation
  • This can be done:
    1. After 30 days from filing the application with SEBI
    2. Unless SEBI advises otherwise

2. Applicability

  • The fast-track mechanism applies to non-LVF (non-Large Value Fund) schemes

3. Objective of the Measure

The initiative aims to:

  • Reduce time lag in scheme launch
  • Improve fundraising efficiency
  • Streamline regulatory processing timelines

4. Regulatory Safeguard

  • SEBI retains the authority to issue observations or objections within the 30-day period
  • Ensures continued regulatory oversight

5. Impact on AIF Ecosystem

  • Accelerates capital raising process
  • Enhances ease of doing business for fund managers
  • Promotes faster deployment of investment capital

6. Conclusion

The Fast-Track Mechanism marks a shift towards a more efficient and responsive regulatory framework, enabling AIFs to launch schemes and engage investors more quickly while maintaining necessary oversight.

Click Here To Read The Full Press Release

The post SEBI Introduces Fast-Track PPM Processing for AIFs appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

RBI Sets Norms for Agency Banks Handling Government Business

RBI agency banks commission norms

Notification No. CO.DGBA.GBD.No.S44/31.02.007/2026-27, Dated: 30.04.2026

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has laid down a comprehensive framework governing the conduct of Government business by Agency Banks, covering agency commission, operational norms, and oversight mechanisms.

1. Scope of the Framework

  • Applicable to agency Banks handling Government transactions
  • Covers:
    1. Collection and payment services
    2. Commission claims and compliance requirements

2. Key Provisions

2.1 Eligible and Ineligible Transactions

The framework clearly defines:

  • Transactions eligible for agency commission
  • Transactions excluded from commission claims

2.2 Agency Commission Structure

  • Specifies applicable commission rates for different Government transactions
  • Ensures uniformity and clarity in remuneration to banks

2.3 Timelines for Claims

  • Banks must submit agency commission claims within prescribed timelines
  • Delays may impact eligibility for reimbursement

2.4 Reporting Requirements

Banks are required to:

  • Maintain accurate records
  • Submit periodic reports to RBI

2.5 Audit and Oversight

  • The framework mandates audit checks and verification processes
  • Ensures:
    1. Proper utilisation of public funds
    2. Compliance with regulatory norms

3. Accountability and Penal Provisions

  • Banks are responsible for accuracy of commission claims
  • In case of incorrect or excess claims
  • RBI may levy penal interest

4. Objective of the Framework

The directions aim to:

  • Enhance transparency and accountability
  • Ensure efficient handling of Government transactions
  • Strengthen financial discipline among Agency Banks

5. Conclusion

The framework establishes a structured and accountable system for Agency Banks, ensuring that Government business is conducted with accuracy, compliance, and proper oversight, while safeguarding public funds.

Click Here To Read The Full Notification

The post RBI Sets Norms for Agency Banks Handling Government Business appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

HC Dismisses Writ Against Oral Termination Due to Delay

oral termination writ dismissed

Case Details: Ad Films Valas vs. Sharad Mirashi - [2026] 185 taxmann.com 404 (HC-Bombay)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Amit Borkar, J.
  • Suresh Pakale, Sr. Adv., Nilesh DesaiZahid Butt for the Petitioner.
  • Ms Samiksha KananiMs Gayatri Naik for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the Respondent-employee filed a complaint of unfair labour practice under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions (MRTU) & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (PULP) Act against the petitioners-employer (a film production establishment registered under the Shops and Establishments Act).

He stated he joined as peon in 1980, was promoted to office assistant in 1993, remained on leave due to his wife’s kidney ailment, resumed work, demanded unpaid wages for June–July 2012, and alleged that after a dispute with petitioner No. 2 he was orally terminated with effect from late August 2012 without notice or due procedure, with non-compliance of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act; he sought reinstatement with back wages.

During pendency, on an interim application, the Labour Court directed the petitioners to permit the respondent to report for duty and to pay wages in accordance with attendance pending the complaint. The Labour Court recorded the absence of a show cause notice and domestic enquiry, noted non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, and that the complainant’s material remained unchallenged as notices issued to petitioners were refused. Further, it also considered the employee’s personal circumstances while assessing the balance of convenience.

Petitioners moved applications before the Labour Court to set aside the interim order and sought review. The Labour Court rejected the review application. The petitioners thereafter filed a revision before the Industrial Court. The Industrial Court dismissed the revision, noting that it was delayed and that the explanation for the delay was unsatisfactory.

It was noted that the Labour Court had applied its mind to the material placed before it, though at a prima facie level, and had specifically recorded that no show cause notice was issued to the complainant before termination and that no domestic enquiry was conducted, which went to the root of fairness in the employer’s action.

High Court Held

The High Court held that since the petitioners had not acted with due promptness and had failed to show a convincing and reasonable explanation for the delay, there was no good reason for the Court to unsettle the concurrent orders of the Labour Court and the Industrial Court on a challenge that was grossly delayed. Therefore, petitioners had failed to make out any case for interference, and the writ petition was to be dismissed.

The post HC Dismisses Writ Against Oral Termination Due to Delay appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

HC Allows Fresh Hearing in Agri Transport GST Exemption Case

agri transport GST exemption

Case Details: Tvl. Jaya Roadways vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes - [2026] 185 taxmann.com 613 (Madras)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.
  • B. Rooban for the Petitioner.
  • R. Suresh Kumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner challenged an assessment order, wherein tax liability was fastened on the basis of alleged absence of proper supporting documents such as tax invoices or tickets in relation to its transportation activities. It was directed to appear for a personal hearing, but did not file its reply or produce documents on that date; however, a reply was subsequently uploaded on the web portal. An impugned order was passed based on available records, recording that the petitioner was engaged in passenger transportation services and had failed to substantiate its claims. The petitioner contended that the reply and supporting materials were not considered and that it was engaged in the transport of agricultural goods, thereby entitling it to an exemption under the relevant provisions. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that although the petitioner had not effectively utilised the initial opportunity granted for a personal hearing, the subsequent filing of a reply indicated sufficient diligence warranting consideration of its submissions on the merits. It was observed that the entire liability under the assessment order appeared to have been imposed primarily due to non-production or alleged non-consideration of supporting documents, including the claim of exemption for transportation of agricultural goods under Section 11 read with Section 73 of the CGST Act. It was noted that the denial of consideration of the reply uploaded shortly before passing of the order resulted in procedural unfairness. Consequently, the High Court set aside the assessment order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration with a direction to grant a personal hearing and adjudicate the issue afresh.

The post HC Allows Fresh Hearing in Agri Transport GST Exemption Case appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

RBI Issues Directions on ‘Disbursement of Government Pension by Agency Banks’

RBI pension disbursement

RBI/DGBA/2026-27/399 CO.DGBA.GBD.No.S43/31.02.007/2026-27; Dated: 30.04.2026

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued the “Directions on Disbursement of Government Pension by Agency Banks, 2026”, laying down a comprehensive framework for pension handling and payment processes.

1. Scope and Applicability

  • Applicable to agency banks handling government pension disbursement
  • Covers end-to-end pension processing, credit, and servicing norms

2. Key Operational Guidelines

2.1 Pension Withdrawal & Disbursement

Clear norms for:

  • Withdrawal of pension by beneficiaries
  • Timely disbursement of pension amounts

2.2 Reimbursement Mechanism

  • Specifies procedures for reimbursement of pension payments made by banks
  • Ensures smooth settlement between government and banks

2.3 Role of Bank Branches

Branches maintaining pension accounts must:

  • Ensure accurate and timely credit
  • Provide efficient customer service to pensioners

2.4 Issuance of Pension Slips

  • Banks are required to issue pension slips
  • Enables greater transparency for pensioners

3. Governance and Accountability Measures

3.1 Appointment of Nodal Officers

  • Banks must designate nodal officers
  • Responsible for oversight and grievance handling

3.2 Timely Credit of Pension

  • Pension must be credited within prescribed timelines

3.3 Compensation for Delay

  • In case of delay banks are liable to pay compensation to pensioners

4. Objective of the Directions

The framework aims to:

  • Ensure timely and accurate pension disbursement
  • Strengthen accountability of agency banks
  • Enhance service quality and transparency for pensioners

5. Conclusion

The Directions establish a structured and accountable pension disbursement system, ensuring that pensioners receive their dues on time with improved service standards and grievance redressal mechanisms.

Click Here To Read The Full Update

The post RBI Issues Directions on ‘Disbursement of Government Pension by Agency Banks’ appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

[World Tax News] Serbia Publishes Deemed Arm’s Length Interest Rates for Related-party Financing

Serbia arm length interest rates

Editorial Team – [2026] 186 taxmann.com 13 (Article)

World Tax News provides a weekly snippet of tax news from around the globe. Here is a glimpse of the tax happening in the world this week:

1. Serbia Publishes Deemed Arm’s Length Interest Rates for Related-party Financing for 2026

On 24 April 2026 (published in Official Gazette No. 36/26), the Serbian Ministry of Finance issued the Rulebook prescribing interest rates in line with the arm’s length principle for 2026 (“TP Rulebook”). This TP Rulebook specifies the applicable interest rates for related-party financing.

As per the new TP Rulebook, there are no major changes in interest rates applicable to banks and financial leasing companies compared to 2025, except for a significant increase in rates for RUB-denominated credits and loans. For other companies, interest rates are marginally lower than in 2025, and the Rulebook does not prescribe rates for short-term USD credits and loans. Set out below is a tabular summary of the interest rates for 2026 considered to be at arm’s length:

Banks & Financial Leasing Companies

  • RSD short-term loans 4.40%
  • RSD long-term loans 0.33%
  • EUR/RSD indexed to EUR 4.87%
  • USD/RSD indexed to USD 4.98%
  • CHF/RSD indexed to CHF 3.05%
  • SEK/RSD indexed to SEK 4.12%
  • GBP/RSD indexed to GBP 1.50%
  • RUB/RSD indexed to RUB 10.73%

Other Companies

  • RSD short-term loans 7.13%
  • RSD long-term loans 7.21%
  • Short-term EUR/RSD indexed to EUR 4.75%
  • Long-term EUR/RSD indexed to EUR 5.42%
  • Long-term CHF/RSD indexed to CHF 7.10%
  • Long-term USD/RSD indexed to USD 4.43%

Source – Official Website

2. Australian Treasury Consulting on Standard Deduction of up to AUD 1,000 for Work-related Expenses

The Australian Treasury has released a consultation on a proposal to amend tax law to introduce a standard deduction of up to $1,000 for Australian tax residents earning income from work, effective from 1 July 2026. Existing provisions will continue to apply to individuals with work-related expenses exceeding $1,000 and to those earning only business or investment income.

The proposal also allows certain deductions in addition to the standard deduction, including investment expenses, charitable donations, and union or professional association membership fees. It further includes measures to prevent double benefits through salary packaging of expenses covered by the instant deduction and updates substantiation and capital allowance rules to support the new framework.

Source – Australian Treasury

Click Here To Read The Full Article

The post [World Tax News] Serbia Publishes Deemed Arm’s Length Interest Rates for Related-party Financing appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

[Opinion] Women in Corporate Governance and Boardrooms

women in corporate governance

CS Hasti Vora – [2026] 185 taxmann.com 894 (Article)

“Shatter glass ceilings and never look back”.

Ritu Karidhar, Senior Scientist ISRO (Rocket Woman of India)

1. A Seat at the Table The Unfinished Symphony of Women in Corporate Governance

There was a time—not too distant in the annals of corporate history—when boardrooms were echo chambers of sameness. Polished mahogany tables reflected not diversity, but uniformity; not plurality of thought, but a singular, often myopic worldview. Decisions of monumental economic consequence were crafted in spaces where half the world’s intellect, intuition, and insight was conspicuously absent.

And yet, quietly at first, then with resolute cadence, women began to arrive.

Not as guests. Not as tokens. But as architects of transformation.

They entered not with the clamour of entitlement, but with the quiet authority of earned presence—each step measured, each voice deliberate, each contribution impossible to ignore. What began as a solitary seat at expansive tables soon evolved into a chorus of intellect, perspective, and conviction. They did not merely occupy space; they redefined it. The very air of the boardroom shifted—once dense with uniformity, now alive with nuance, dissent, empathy, and foresight.

No longer ornamental inclusions or symbolic gestures, these women dismantled the antiquated scaffolding of tokenism. They questioned assumptions long left unchallenged, introduced dimensions of thought that transcended conventional binaries, and infused decision-making with a rare blend of analytical rigour and intuitive depth. Their presence was not disruptive—it was transformative in the most profound sense subtle, enduring, and irrevocably impactful.

They brought with them stories the boardroom had never heard—of resilience forged in constraint, of leadership cultivated without precedent, of ambition that had learned to persist despite invisibility. And in doing so, they expanded the very definition of leadership itself. It was no longer confined to dominance or declaration; it now embraced collaboration, emotional intelligence, and a long-term vision rooted in collective prosperity.

Over time, their influence began to echo beyond quarterly reports and strategic frameworks. It seeped into corporate culture, into hiring philosophies, into the aspirations of young women watching from afar—women who no longer saw boardrooms as distant fortresses, but as inevitable destinations.

Thus, what began as a quiet arrival became a powerful reconstitution of power itself. Not imposed, but earned. Not demanded, but demonstrated. And in that evolution lies a truth both simple and profound when women rise within institutions, they do not merely change outcomes—they change the very nature of how outcomes are imagined.

2. The Emergence From Margins to Mandates

The journey of women into corporate governance has been neither accidental nor entirely organic—it has been sculpted through policy, persistence, and undeniable performance.

Consider this according to reports by McKinsey & Company, companies in the top quartile for gender diversity on executive teams are 25% more likely to experience above-average profitability than those in the bottom quartile. Similarly, research by Catalyst reveals that firms with higher female board representation demonstrate superior return on equity (ROE) and stronger governance outcomes.

In India, regulatory intervention played a catalytic role. The Securities and Exchange Board of India mandated, through the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, that every listed company must appoint at least one independent woman director subject to pre-requisites. What began as compliance has, in many cases, evolved into conviction.

As of recent estimates, women now hold approximately 13–19% of board seats in across the globe—a marked rise from less than 6% a decade ago.

Yet, numbers alone tell only a fraction of the story.

3. The Power of Perspective Why Women Change the Game

Women do not merely occupy seats—they alter the geometry of decision-making.

For what they bring is not just presence, but perspective; not just participation, but reconfiguration. The structural paradigm of decision-making—once linear, hierarchical, and often unidimensional—begins to evolve into something far more intricate, far more complete. Angles widen. Blind spots shrink. What was once a straight line of consensus transforms into a dynamic, multi-angled prism of thought.

Women introduce a deliberative depth that challenges the velocity of unchecked agreement. They ask different questions—not for the sake of dissent, but for the pursuit of clarity. Where decisions were once driven predominantly by financial immediacy, they introduce considerations of sustainability, ethics, and long-term impact. The calculus changes; success is no longer measured solely in margins, but in meaning.

They recalibrate the balance between risk and responsibility. Studies have often shown that women leaders tend to approach risk not with aversion, but with informed prudence—weighing consequences more holistically, accounting for stakeholders often left at the periphery. In doing so, they do not slow decisions; they strengthen them.

Moreover, they humanise governance. In rooms historically dominated by abstraction—numbers, forecasts, projections—women often reintroduce the human variable the employee, the consumer, the community. Decisions begin to carry not just strategic intelligence, but emotional intelligence—an attribute long undervalued, yet profoundly consequential.

And perhaps most significantly, they disrupt the quiet complacency of homogeneity. Diversity of gender begets diversity of thought, and diversity of thought is the crucible of innovation. Assumptions are interrogated, ideas are stress-tested, and outcomes are no longer the product of comfort, but of conviction.

Thus, the geometry shifts—not by force, but by influence. From rigid to fluid. From narrow to expansive. From predictable to profoundly perceptive. And in that transformation, decision-making ceases to be a mere exercise of authority—it becomes an art of understanding, enriched by the presence of women who reshape not just the seat, but the system itself. Studies indicate that women directors exhibit greater risk-awareness and ethical sensitivity.

Women leaders often prioritise long-term sustainability over short-term gains. ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) metrics tend to improve in companies with higher female representation, aligning corporate objectives with societal expectations.

Homogeneous boards are prone to “groupthink.” Diverse boards, conversely, are crucibles of debate. The presence of women in leadership cascades downward, fostering inclusive organisational cultures. It signals to the workforce that merit, not gender, dictates ascension.

Click Here To Read The Full Article

The post [Opinion] Women in Corporate Governance and Boardrooms appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

[Global Financial Insights] FASB Issues Accounting Standards on Initial Measurement of Paid-in-kind Dividends and More

FASB PIK dividends

Editorial Team – [2026] 185 taxmann.com 951 (Article)

Global Financial Insights is a weekly feature for the Accounts and Audit Module subscribers of Taxmann.com. It provides you with the latest updates on financial reporting and auditing practices from across the globe. Here is this week’s financial update:

1. FASB Issues Accounting Standards Update on Initial Measurement of Paid-in-Kind Dividends on Equity-classified Preferred Stock

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has issued a new Accounting Standards Update (ASU) to address how companies should measure paid-in-kind (PIK) dividends on equity-classified preferred stock at initial recognition. The guidance is based on a recommendation from the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) and aims to bring clarity to an area where existing US GAAP was silent.

In practice, the absence of clear guidance has led to different measurement approaches being followed by entities. This inconsistency not only affected the carrying value of preferred stock in the balance sheet but also had implications for the calculation of earnings available to common shareholders, thereby reducing comparability across financial statements.

  • Improving Consistency in Financial Reporting – The ASU introduces a uniform approach to address this diversity. By standardising how PIK dividends are measured, the guidance is expected to improve comparability between companies and provide investors with more consistent and meaningful information, particularly in assessing the economic value and liquidation preference of preferred stock.
  • Measurement Aligned with Contractual Terms – Under the new guidance, entities are required to measure PIK dividends initially based on the dividend rate specified in the preferred stock agreement. This approach links the accounting treatment directly to the contractual terms, reducing subjectivity and enhancing transparency.

Source – Financial Accounting Standard Board

2. IASB April 2026 Update Focus on Financial Instruments, Leases, Equity Method and Disclosure Reforms

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), in its April 2026 meetings, continued redeliberations across several key projects, including financial instruments, leases, business combinations and cash flow reporting. The discussions largely focused on refining existing proposals, improving clarity in application and addressing stakeholder feedback.

  • Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity – The IASB reaffirmed its proposed approach for classifying financial instruments that contain contingent settlement provisions, with some targeted clarifications. It emphasised that such requirements apply where settlement depends on uncertain future events beyond the control of both issuer and holder. The Board also clarified certain inconsistencies in IAS 32, which states that dividend payments are recognised as expenses if shares are wholly classified (instead of recognised) as liabilities to resolve an inconsistency within the Standard. Further, additional clarity was provided on key terms such as “liquidation” and “not genuine”, ensuring a more consistent interpretation in practice. However, the IASB decided to exclude measurement-related aspects of such liabilities from this project and instead address them separately under its amortised cost project.
  • IFRS 16 – Limited Changes Emerging from Post-implementation Review – As part of its post-implementation review of IFRS 16, the IASB considered feedback on lease-related cash flow disclosures. Rather than making broad changes, the Board decided to explore requiring more detailed disclosure of lease cash outflows and their classification within the cash flow statement. At the same time, it chose not to take action on concerns relating to classification differences or comparability between leasing and borrowing transactions, indicating that the current framework remains largely appropriate.
  • Amortised Cost Measurement – Refining Effective Interest Rate Guidance – The IASB discussed improvements to the accounting for changes in the effective interest rate (EIR). It tentatively decided that entities should adjust the EIR when there is a re-estimation of contractual cash flows related to time value of money or credit risk. This aims to bring greater consistency and clarity in applying IFRS 9.
  • Equity Method – Targeted Clarifications on Cost and Additional Investments – In its ongoing work on the equity method, the IASB confirmed several proposals to improve clarity in accounting. It decided to include deferred tax effects in determining the cost of an associate and clarified the treatment of costs incurred when issuing instruments to gain significant influence. The Board also confirmed that gains arising from bargain purchases of additional ownership interests should be recognised in profit or loss, while providing relief in situations where prior losses were not recognised due to the investment being reduced to nil.
  • Business Combinations – Streamlining Disclosure Requirements – The IASB continued its deliberations on improving disclosures related to business combinations. It decided to retain a threshold-based approach for identifying which acquisitions require detailed performance disclosures, while simplifying the criteria by removing certain thresholds. The Board also refined proposals relating to disclosure exemptions, particularly in situations where disclosure could breach legal or regulatory requirements. Additionally, it reaffirmed its proposal to include cash flows from future restructurings and asset enhancements in value-in-use calculations under IAS 36.
  • Statement of Cash Flows – Improving Definition of Cash Equivalents – As part of its broader project on cash flow reporting, the IASB proposed clarifying that cash equivalents should be held primarily to meet short-term cash commitments rather than for investment purposes. This is intended to improve consistency in how entities apply the definition under IAS 7.
  • Consistent Application – IFRIC Agenda Decisions Finalised – The IASB also reviewed several agenda decisions issued by the IFRS Interpretations Committee and did not object to them. These decisions, covering areas such as foreign exchange differences, lease arrangements, fair presentation and expense disclosures, will be finalised and published, providing additional interpretative guidance without changing existing standards.

Overall, the April 2026 discussions reflect the IASB’s continued focus on refining existing standards, addressing practical challenges and enhancing consistency and transparency in financial reporting.

Source – IFRS Foundation

Click Here To Read The Full Article

The post [Global Financial Insights] FASB Issues Accounting Standards on Initial Measurement of Paid-in-kind Dividends and More appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source