Categories
Blog Updates

RBI Circular On Export Credit Interest Subsidy Under EPM Scheme 2026

RBI Export Credit Interest Subsidy 2026

Circular no. RBI/2025-26/195 DOR.STR.REC.393/04.02.001/2025-26 dated: 19.01.2026

1. Introduction: RBI Issues Export Credit Subsidy Circular for 2026

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued a circular dated 19 January 2026 to operationalise the Government of India’s pilot Export Promotion Mission (Niryat Prothsahan). The circular provides for interest subsidy on pre-shipment and post-shipment export credit to eligible exporters, with the objective of strengthening India’s export competitiveness.

2. Background: Export Promotion Mission (Niryat Prothsahan)

The Export Promotion Mission (EPM), also known as Niryat Prothsahan, is a targeted initiative aimed at easing credit costs for exporters. Under this pilot scheme, interest subsidy is extended on export credit facilities to reduce financial burden and improve liquidity for exporters engaged in eligible export activities.

3. Scope of RBI Circular and Applicability

As per Circular No. RBI/2025-26/195, RBI has directed all eligible banks and financial institutions to extend the interest subsidy strictly to qualifying exporters and eligible export credit only. The implementation of the scheme must align with RBI’s regulatory framework and operational guidelines issued under the banking and credit policy norms.

4. Compliance With DGFT Trade Notices

Banks and financial institutions are required to adhere to Trade Notices No. 20/2025-26 and 22/2025-26 issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT). These trade notices define exporter eligibility, procedural requirements, and operational conditions for availing benefits under the EPM scheme.

5. Claim Process and Conclusion

Claims for interest subsidy under the EPM scheme must be submitted through the prescribed process and within the timelines specified by RBI and DGFT. Strict compliance with documentation, eligibility conditions, and regulatory instructions is mandatory. This RBI circular marks a significant step in supporting exporters through structured credit incentives while ensuring regulatory discipline in subsidy disbursement.

Click Here To Read The Full Circular 

The post RBI Circular On Export Credit Interest Subsidy Under EPM Scheme 2026 appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Non Participation Due To Ignorance; Case Remanded | HC

Assessee Ignorance Of Proceedings Case Remanded

Case Details: Sivasakthi Constructions vs. Joint Commissioner (ST) [2026] 182 taxmann.com 349 (Madras)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • C. Saravanan, J.
  • S. Velu for the Petitioner.
  • V.Prashanth Kiran, Government Adv. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner challenged ex parte assessment orders confirming GST demands. Show Cause Notices in GST DRC-01 were issued for the respective tax periods, to which the petitioner failed to reply, resulting in the impugned assessment orders. In an affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the petitioner contended that it was unaware of the proceedings and did not participate in the adjudication. It sought leniency by submitting that it supported marginalized sections of society by providing employment and requested an opportunity to defend the case. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that under similar circumstances, orders have been quashed and remitted for fresh adjudication on terms, subject to the assessee depositing 50% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the delay in approaching the Court. The assessee was directed to file a reply to the SCN together with requisite documents substantiating the case, treating the respective impugned orders as an addendum to the SCN. The Court held that the concerned authority should pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, applying Section 75 of the CGST Act/Tamil Nadu GST Act.

List of Cases Referred to

List of Cases Referred to

The post Non Participation Due To Ignorance; Case Remanded | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Compensation Upheld For Driver’s Death During Employment | SC

Compensation For Death During Course Of Employment

Case Details: Panganti Vijaya vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd. [2026] 182 taxmann.com 109 (SC)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Vikram Nath & Augustine George Masih, JJ.
  • P. Venkat Reddy, Prashant Kumar Tyagi  &  P. Srinivas Reddy, Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • Lalit Chauhan, Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Anith Jonshan, Ms. Khushi Sehrawat, Advs., Ms. Mrinal Gopal Elker & Manoj C. Mishra, Aors for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the deceased was employed by the respondent as a driver. While driving a vehicle, the deceased met with a fatal accident when a lorry coming from the opposite direction rammed into the vehicle.

Thereafter, the appellant, being the legal representative of the deceased, filed a claim under the Act stating that the deceased was employed as a driver of the respondent and that the accident occurred during and in the course of employment.

Relying on oral and documentary evidence, the Commissioner found that the deceased was employed as a driver with the respondent and that the accident occurred during and in the course of employment.

Accordingly, joint and several liability was fixed, and the Insurance Company and the owner of the vehicle were directed to pay compensation of Rs. 3,73,747, along with interest at 12% per annum, to the appellant.

The Insurance Company challenged the order in the High Court. The High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Commissioner’s order. Before the Supreme Court, the respondent failed to enter an appearance despite the service of notice.

It was noted that the respondent appeared before the Court and filed an affidavit on oath, wherein he unequivocally admitted that the deceased was under his employment. Further, in view of the above, it was to be held that the deceased was employed as a driver and his death occurred during the course of and arising out of his employment.

Supreme Court Held

The Supreme Court held that the claim of the appellant was rightly allowed by the Commissioner and the interference by the High Court was unwarranted. Further, the judgment and order passed by the High Court were to be set aside, and the award passed by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation awarding compensation was to be restored.

List of Cases Reviewed

  • United lndia lnsurance Company Ltd. v. Panganti Vijaya [CMA No. 98 of 2010], dated 22.03.2022 (para 4) set aside

The post Compensation Upheld For Driver’s Death During Employment | SC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

RBI Amends Priority Sector Lending Framework 2026

RBI Priority Sector Lending Amendment 2026

Circular no. RBI/FIDD/2025-26/196 FIDD.CO.PSD.BC.No.11/04.09.001/2025-26 dated: 19.01.2026

1. Introduction: RBI Revises Priority Sector Lending Norms

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued the Priority Sector Lending (Amendment) Directions, 2026, through Circular No. RBI/FIDD/2025-26/196 dated 19 January 2026. These amendments aim to bring clarity, consistency, and regulatory alignment in the computation of Priority Sector Lending (PSL) targets across different categories of banks.

2. ANBC Computation: Key Clarifications Introduced

Under the amended framework, RBI has refined the calculation of Adjusted Net Bank Credit (ANBC). Certain long-term bonds and advances funded through FCNR(B) and NRE deposits have been excluded from ANBC computation. This clarification reduces ambiguity and ensures that PSL targets are calculated on a more accurate and comparable base.

3. Treatment of Off-Balance Sheet Exposures

The amended directions also align the treatment of off-balance sheet exposures with the updated prudential norms. RBI has ensured that such exposures are considered uniformly across banking institutions, thereby preventing inconsistencies in PSL reporting and compliance arising from divergent accounting or regulatory interpretations.

4. Guidance for Small Finance Banks (SFBs)

Special provisions have been introduced for Small Finance Banks (SFBs) transitioning into the PSL framework. The directions clarify the treatment of grandfathered loans, prevent double-counting of eligible advances, and specify that PSL targets for SFBs shall be fixed based on their first audited balance sheet post-transition.

5. Conclusion: Enhancing Uniformity and Regulatory Clarity

The RBI Priority Sector Lending (Amendment) Directions, 2026, strengthen the PSL framework by standardising ANBC computation, aligning exposure treatment, and providing clear transition guidance for SFBs. These changes are expected to improve regulatory consistency, transparency, and ease of compliance for banks while maintaining the policy objective of credit flow to priority sectors.

Click Here To Read The Full Circular 

The post RBI Amends Priority Sector Lending Framework 2026 appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

[World Corporate Law News] ASIC Proposes Extending AFS Licence Relief

ASIC AFS Licence Relief Securitisation Entities

[2026] 182 taxmann.com 534 (Article)

World Corporate Law News provides a weekly snapshot of corporate law developments from around the globe. Here’s a glimpse of the key corporate law update this week.

1. Securities Law

1.1 ASIC proposes to extend relief for securitisation entities from holding an AFS licence

On January 20, 2026, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) sought feedback on a proposal to remake a relief instrument to extend the exemption for securitisation entities from holding an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence.

ASIC proposes to remake the Instrument on largely the same terms for a period of five and a half years.

ASIC Instrument 2016/272 exempts a securitisation entity from holding an AFS licence where it holds the securitisation product as a custodian or trustee or issues a securitisation product to:

(a) An AFS licence holder
(b) An entity that is exempted from holding an AFS licence or
(c) A wholesale client

Under the Legislation Act 2003, legislative instruments are repealed, or ‘sunset’, after 10 years, unless ASIC acts to preserve them.

Source : Official announcement

Click Here To Read The Full Article 

The post [World Corporate Law News] ASIC Proposes Extending AFS Licence Relief appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

New Labour Codes | Accounting Implications Explained

Accounting Implications Of New Labour Codes

[2025] 171 taxmann.com 681 (Article)

Introduction

The enactment of the New Labour Codes marks a significant shift in India’s employment and compensation framework, with far-reaching implications for employee benefit accounting. One of the most consequential changes relates to the redefinition of “wages” and its direct impact on gratuity and other defined benefit obligations accounted for under AS 15 and Ind AS 19. For professional accountants, this change raises important questions around recognition, timing, presentation, and disclosure of increased liabilities.

1. Key definitions and terminology under Ind AS 19

To understand the accounting implications arising from the enactment of the New Labour Codes, it is important to first become familiar with the key terms and definitions used in Ind AS 19. The relevant concepts are explained below.

1.1. Post-employee benefit plan

Post employee benefit plan are the formal or informal arrangements under which an entity provides post-employment benefits for one or more employee. Thus, under these plans, the benefits are given to the employees after employment. Further, the post-employment benefit plans are broadly classified as “Defined Contribution Plans” and “Defined Benefit Plans”.

1.2. Defined Contribution Plans

Defined contribution plans are post-employment benefit plans under which an entity pays fixed contributions into a separate entity (a fund) and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employee benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior periods.
Example: Contribution in the nature of “Provident Fund” made by the employer to the Employee Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO).

1.3. Defined Benefit Plans

Defined benefit plans are the post-employment benefit plans other than defined contribution plans. Thus, under a defined benefit plan, the employer’s obligation is to provide the agreed level of benefits to employees, after considering the actuarial and investment risks.
Example: Payment of “Gratuity” by the employer to the employee.

1.4. Actuarial gain or loss under defined benefit plan

Actuarial gains and losses are changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation resulting from:

(a) experience adjustments (the effects of differences between the previous actuarial assumptions and what has actually occurred) and

(b) the effects of changes in actuarial assumptions.

1.5. Past service cost under defined benefit plan

Past service cost is the change in the present value of the defined benefit obligation for employee service in prior periods, resulting from a plan amendment (the introduction or withdrawal of, or changes to, a defined benefit plan) or a curtailment (a significant reduction by the entity in the number of employees covered by a plan).

2. Understanding the Impact of the New Labour Code on Accounting of defined benefit plans

The “New Labour Codes” introduce significant changes to the determination of wages and the computation of gratuity. Under the revised framework, a minimum of 50% of an employee’s total remuneration is required to comprise “Basic Pay”, “Dearness Allowance” and “Retaining Allowance”, collectively defined as “wages.” Where these components constitute less than 50% of total remuneration, the law mandates a deemed adjustment, such that wages are considered to be 50% of total remuneration for statutory purposes.
Further, with the subsuming of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, into the New Labour Codes, gratuity is now required to be calculated based on the last drawn wages, which, as noted above, must be at least 50% of total remuneration. This change has a direct bearing on the quantum of gratuity liability for employers.

In addition to changes in computation, the Codes also expand the eligibility criteria for gratuity. While the requirement of five years of continuous service continues to apply to permanent employees, fixed-term employees, including contract workers, are now entitled to gratuity upon completion of one year of service.

2.1. Impact of New Labour Code on accounting for gratuity

As explained earlier, the revised definition of “wages” under the New Labour Codes, along with the extension of gratuity eligibility to fixed-term employees (including contract workers) after completion of one year of service, is expected to increase gratuity and other long-term employee benefit liabilities for employers.

From an accounting perspective, recognising this increased liability is critical, particularly because the new definition of wages applies immediately. Accordingly, any employee whose last working day is on or after 21st November 2025 is required to be paid gratuity in line with the New Labour Codes. This creates several practical questions for preparers of financial statements, especially for listed entities with a 31st March financial year-end that publish quarterly financial results. Key questions include:

(a) Accounting of increased liability

How shall the company recognise the increased gratuity liability arising from the implementation of the New Labour Codes?

(b) Timing of recognition

Whether the additional gratuity obligation arising from application of the New Labour Codes should be recognised in the financial results for the quarter ended 31st December 2025, or whether the impact can be deferred to the financial year ending 31st March 2026?

(c) Assessment of subsequent events

Whether the increase in gratuity liability should be considered an adjusting event or a non-adjusting event for the purpose of preparing financial statements?

(d) Presentation in the Statement of Profit and Loss

Whether the additional expense arising from the increase in gratuity obligations can be presented as an exceptional item in the Statement of Profit and Loss?

Click Here To Read The Full Story

The post New Labour Codes | Accounting Implications Explained appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

MSEFC Order Quashed For Section 16 Enquiry Lapse | HC

MSEFC Section 16 Jurisdictional Enquiry

Case Details: Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Chennai Region - [2025] 181 taxmann.com 976 (HC - Madras)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • V. Lakshminarayanan, J.
  • Om Prakash, Senior Counsel & Raghavendra Ross Divakar for the Petitioner.
  • K. Krishnan for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the petitioner had entered into a works contract with the second respondent. The second respondent initiated proceedings before the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC), alleging default in payment.

The petitioner objected that, being a works contract, the claim was not covered under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED), and filed a writ petition before the High Court seeking to quash the proceedings.

The High Court, in writ petition, directed the MSEFC, before passing any final order, to immediately examine the petitioner’s application under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act regarding MSEFC’s jurisdiction, to call for any additional details if required, to conduct an enquiry with the opportunity of personal hearing, and to pass a reasoned order dealing with each contention and communicate decision.

Subsequently, the MSEFC disposed of the Section 16 petition vide the impugned order. Thereafter, an appeal was made before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that since MSEFC had not performed the exercise required to determine its jurisdiction in terms of Section 16 of the Act, the impugned order was to be set aside, and the matter was to be remanded back to MSEFC to redo the exercise directed by the High Court in the earlier writ petition.

List of Cases Referred to

The post MSEFC Order Quashed For Section 16 Enquiry Lapse | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Assignment Of Leasehold Rights Not Taxable As Service | HC

Assignment Of Leasehold Rights Not Supply Of Service

Case Details: Aerocom Cushions (P.) Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner (Anti-Evasion), CGST & CX, Nagpur-1 - [2026] 182 taxmann.com 432 (Bombay) 

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Anil L. Pansare & Nivedita P. Mehta, JJ.
  • Vinay Shraff, Counsel & Ms. Darshana Bhaiya for the Petitioner.
  • K.K. Nalamwar, Counsel for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner received a notice under Section 74(1) of the CGST Act alleging concealment of a transaction in which it assigned its leasehold rights in a plot of land allotted to it. It was contended that the assignment of leasehold rights would amount to the supply of services under Section 7 of the CGST Act. The petitioner challenged the notice by filing the instant writ petition, asserting that the transaction constituted a transfer of immovable property rather than a supply of services. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the transaction on record constituted a transfer of immovable property, namely the assignment of leasehold rights in a plot allotted, and therefore did not involve any supply of services. It was observed that the transfer pertained exclusively to benefits arising out of immovable property and had no nexus with the business of the petitioner company, thus negating the essential element of supply of service in the course or furtherance of business. The Court held that such an assignment/transfer of leasehold rights is not subject to GST. The petition was allowed and the impugned order was set aside.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

The post Assignment Of Leasehold Rights Not Taxable As Service | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Mandamus Issued Over Denial Of Set-Off Claim | HC

Mandamus For Set-Off Claim Denial

Case Details: K2 Family (P.) Trust vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - [2026] 182 taxmann.com 19 (Bombay) 

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • B. P. Colabawalla & Amit S. Jamsandekar, JJ.
  • Harsh Shah, Paras Savla, Advs. & Percy J. Pardiwalla, Sr. Adv. for the Petitioner.
  • Ms. Mamta Omle, Adv. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner Trust earned short-term capital gains from the sale of equity shares and units of equity-oriented mutual funds on which STT was paid [STCG (STT paid)]. It also incurred short-term capital loss from the sale of equity shares on which STT was paid [STCL (STT paid)].

The petitioner was desirous of computing its total income by setting off the STCL (STT paid) against the STCG (non-STT paid). However, when the petitioner attempted to do so while filing its Return of Income electronically, the income-tax utility did not permit a claim to be made where the total income was computed by setting off the STCL (STT paid) against the STCG (non-STT paid).

The petitioner noticed that the utility first set off the STCL (STT paid) against the STCG (STT paid), and only if any losses remained was a set-off of the balance STCL (STT paid) allowed against the STCG (non-STT paid). Aggrieved by this, the petitioner filed a writ petition to the Bombay High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the Income Tax Department processes the return of income under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act. At this stage, adjustments in the nature of arithmetical errors, incorrect claims apparent from records, etc., which are specified in Section 143(1)(a), can be made to the assessee’s income, and an intimation along with the amount of tax payable is issued to the assessee under Section 143(1). If aggrieved, the assessee can avail of remedies provided by the Act, including filing an appeal.

After the stage of processing a return in terms of Section 143(1) stage, the department may also select the assessee’s return for a scrutiny assessment by issuing a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessment proceedings culminate in an assessment order under Section 143(3), against which various remedies, including that of filing an appeal, is available to the assessee.

Thus, the scheme of the Income Tax Act is that an assessee has to compute his income in accordance with his understanding of the law, and, thereafter, the revenue’s role begins, and it frames an assessment having regard to the interpretation they put on the relevant provisions of the law. Ultimately, the hierarchy of appellate authorities under the Act will determine which view is correct.

When an assessee is prevented from making a claim in the Return of Income, it amounts to a determination of that claim at the very threshold, i.e., at the stage of filing of the return itself. This effectively forecloses examination of the claim during the assessment proceedings and, if necessary, adjudication through the appellate hierarchy. If an assessee is not permitted to make a claim merely because the income tax department is of the view that such a claim is not sustainable as per its interpretation, the very purpose of assessment and an appellate mechanism to redress the grievances stands defeated.

The Act contains detailed provisions enabling the income tax department to scrutinise and verify a return, and to accept or reject a claim based on established procedure. Such verification is intended to take place after the return is filed. By disallowing the making of a claim at the stage of filing the return itself, the assessment process is rendered nugatory, and the validity of a claim is pre-decided unilaterally by the Department, an approach wholly alien to the scheme of the Income Tax Act.

Therefore, the High Court directed the Respondent to modify the utility for filing the Return of Income so that the Petitioner is not required to approach the Court again for filing its future Returns of Income.

List of Cases Reviewed

  • Samir Narain Bhojwani v. Dy. CIT [2020] 115 taxmann.com 70 (Bombay)
  • Lupin Limited v. DCIT WP No.3565 of 2023, dated 26-3-2024
  • Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT Writ Petition No.3109 of 2022, dated 26-3-2024
  • Chamber of Tax Consultants v. DIT (systems) [2025] 170 taxmann.com 707 (Bombay)/[2025] 303 Taxman 451 (Bombay)/[2025] 473 ITR 85 (Bombay) (para 21) followed

List of Cases Referred to

  • iShares ESG Aware MSCI ETF v. Dy. CIT(International Taxation)–2(2)(2) [2025] 175 taxmann.com 289 (Mumbai – Trib.) (para 4)
  • Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund a Series of VISPLC v. ACIT (International Taxation) [2025] 174 taxmann.com 1066 (Mumbai – Trib.) (para 4)
  • CIT v. Rungamatee Trexim Pvt. Ltd. [IT Appeal No. 812 of 2008, dated 19-12-2008] (para 4)
  • First State Investments (Hongkong) Ltd. v. Asstt. DIT (International Taxation) [2009] 33 SOT 26 (Mumbai) (para 4)
  • Lupin Limited v. DCIT [WP No.3565 of 2023, dated 26-3-2024] (para 12)
  • Samir Narain Bhojwani v. Dy. CIT [2020] 115 taxmann.com 70 (Bombay) (para 15)
  • Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT [Writ Petition No.3109 of 2022, dated 26-3-2024] (para 17)
  • Chamber of Tax Consultants v. DIT (systems) [2025] 170 taxmann.com 707 (Bombay)/[2025] 303 Taxman 451 (Bombay)/[2025] 473 ITR 85 (Bombay) (para 18)
  • Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT [2006] 157 Taxman 1 (SC)/[2006] 284 ITR 323 (SC) (para 20).

The post Mandamus Issued Over Denial Of Set-Off Claim | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Withholding Increments Without Enquiry Unsustainable | HC

Withholding Of Increments Without Enquiry

Case Details: T. Raj Kumar vs. Labour Court - [2025] 181 taxmann.com 850 (HC - Andhra Pradesh)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, J.
  • A. Veerasekhar Rao for the Petitioner.
  • Sanisetty Venkateswarulu, SC for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the petitioner was a conductor in the respondent corporation. The charges were framed against him regarding cash and ticket irregularities. Without conducting an enquiry, the respondent had passed a final order whereby the petitioner’s annual increment was withheld for a period of six months, having the effect of postponing future increments.

The petitioner challenged the punishment order before the appellate authority, which was rejected as time-barred. The dispute was thereafter carried to the Labour Court under Section 10-1(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, where punishment against the petitioner was confirmed.

It was apparent that the respondent had failed to demonstrate that they had conducted an enquiry before imposing major punishment on the petitioner. Further, the punishment imposed by the respondent, which was mechanically affirmed by the appellate authority as well as the Labour Court, was to be interdicted as it was a fundamental breach of procedure established under law.

High Court Held

The High Court held that since the stoppage of increment with cumulative effect without conducting an enquiry against the petitioner was not legally sustainable, the impugned order passed by the Labour Court was to be set aside.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

The post Withholding Increments Without Enquiry Unsustainable | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source