Categories
Blog Updates

RBI Proposes to Remove Prior Approval for Opening NBFC Branches

RBI NBFC branch approval

Press Release: 2025-2026/2059, Dated 06.02.2026

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has notified the Draft Amendment Directions to the Non-Banking Financial Companies – Branch Authorisation Directions, 2025 and invited comments from regulated entities and stakeholders on the proposed changes.

1. Timeline for Submission of Comments

  • Last date to submit comments – 27 February 2026

Stakeholders are encouraged to provide feedback to assist the RBI in finalising the amended framework.

2. Background and Review of Existing Framework

The draft amendments follow a review of the existing regulatory framework governing the opening and closure of branches by NBFCs.

The RBI has assessed the current approval-based mechanism in light of evolving supervisory practices and the maturity of the NBFC sector.

3. Key Proposal – Removal of Prior Approval/Notice Requirement

The draft directions propose to:

  • Do away with the requirement of prior approval or prior notice to the RBI
  • For opening branches in India by NBFCs

Under the proposed framework, NBFCs would no longer be required to seek regulatory permission or intimate the RBI in advance for opening domestic branches.

4. Objective of the Proposed Amendments

The key objectives of the draft amendments are to:

  • Reduce regulatory friction and procedural delays
  • Enhance operational flexibility for NBFCs
  • Align branch authorisation norms with the evolving regulatory and supervisory environment
  • Support ease of doing business while retaining overall regulatory oversight

5. Regulatory Intent

The proposal reflects the RBI’s intent to move towards:

  • A principles-based regulatory approach
  • Greater reliance on post-facto supervision and disclosures, rather than ex-ante approvals

6. Key Takeaway

If finalised, the amendments will:

  • Simplify the branch expansion process for NBFCs
  • Remove the requirement of prior approval or notice for opening branches in India
  • Mark a significant shift towards a more facilitative regulatory regime
Click Here To Read The Full Press Release

The post RBI Proposes to Remove Prior Approval for Opening NBFC Branches appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Suspension and Charge Sheet Alter Service Conditions – Industrial Dispute Maintainable | HC

suspension and charge sheet industrial dispute

Case Details: Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha vs. Shah and Company - [2026] 182 taxmann.com 42 (HC-Gujarat)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • A.S. Supehia & Gita Gopi, JJ.
  • Amresh Patel, Adv. & Harsh K Raval for the Appellant.
  • RD DaveSahil B. Trivedi, AGP for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the appellant (Trade Union) raised a dispute concerning the respondent (Company) issuing show-cause notices, suspending employees, and charging them with alleged misconduct, including going on strike and refusing to work in the transferred department/non- joining of duties.

The Labour Commissioner referred the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Respondent challenged the reference by filing a writ petition. The Single Judge allowed the writ petition and set aside the reference, relying on standing orders governing disciplinary proceedings and observing that employers could conduct departmental inquiries and that, before intercepting such inquiries through a reference, allegations should be meticulously examined and a strong prima facie case shown.

It was noted that the suspension of the workman and issuance of the charge sheet was an alteration in service condition, and he/she had a statutory and legal right to protest against the same by raising a dispute.

High Court Held

The High Court observed that, the moment the Labour Commissioner was satisfied that there was an existence of a dispute relating to the employment of a workman, it was not further open for him to adjudicate the same or form any opinion regarding the dispute, and he had no other alternative but to refer the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal or to the Labour Court.

The High Court held that the Single Judge had fallen into error in setting aside the order of the Labour Commissioner referring the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal for adjudication while examining the provision of standing orders governing misconduct and disciplinary proceedings. Thus, the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge was to be quashed and set aside.

List of Cases Reviewed

  • Talco Convoy Drivers Mazdoor Sangh v. State of Bihar (1989) 3 SCC 271 (para 16) followed
  • Union of India v. Kunisetty Satyanarayana [2007] 2006 taxmann.com 3129 (SC)/2006 (12) SCC 28 (para 17) distinguished

List of Cases Referred to

  • Syndicate Bank and another v. K. Umesh Nayak (1994) 5 SCC 572 (para 5)
  • Talco Convoy Drivers Mazdoor Sangh v. State of Bihar (1989) 3 SCC 271 (para 5)
  • Union of India v. Kunisetty Satyanarayana [2007] 2006 taxmann.com 3129 (SC) (para 7).

The post Suspension and Charge Sheet Alter Service Conditions – Industrial Dispute Maintainable | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Perishable Arecanuts to Be Released on Bank Guarantee Pending GST Adjudication | HC

perishable goods detained under GST

Case Details: Venkateshwara Traders vs. Union of India - [2026] 182 taxmann.com 889 (Rajasthan)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, ACTG. CJ. & Mrs. Sangeeta Sharma, J.
  • RaaghulNiraj Kumar Yadav, Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • Vigyan Shah, AAG, Rohit TiwariSankalp Vijay, AAAGs, Priyam AgarwalDeepak Mittal, Advs. & Praveen Singh Rajawat, Sr. CGPC for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner traded arecanuts against a purchase order from a registered dealer and issued a tax invoice with IGST charged. During transit, the consignment was intercepted and confiscation proceedings were initiated under Section 129 of the CGST Act, confirming confiscation and imposing penalty and fine. The petitioner filed written replies but no personal appearance was recorded. The confiscation order was challenged through writ petitions, contending that the goods were perishable and their continued detention would cause irreversible loss. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the arecanuts fell within the definition of perishable goods and, therefore, their detention required special consideration. The Court directed release of the goods on furnishing a bank guarantee or solvency security equal to the invoice value, observing that the dispute involved factual examination and interim release would not prejudice the adjudication of the confiscation proceedings. The Court clarified that the release was without prejudice to the merits of the demand, which would be independently examined by the authorities during adjudication under Section 129 read with Section 130 of the CGST Act. The writ petitions were disposed accordingly.

The post Perishable Arecanuts to Be Released on Bank Guarantee Pending GST Adjudication | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

RBI Proposes Credit Index Derivatives Framework

RBI credit derivatives framework

Press Release: 2025-2026/2067, Dated: 06.02.2026

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has released the draft revised Master Direction – Reserve Bank of India (Credit Derivatives) Directions, 2022 and invited comments from market participants and stakeholders on the proposed framework.

1. Timeline for Submission of Comments

  • Last date to submit comments – 27 February 2026

Stakeholder feedback will be considered before finalising the revised Master Direction.

2. Objective of the Draft Revision

The draft Master Direction proposes a revised regulatory framework with the objective of:

  • Enabling the introduction of new credit derivative instruments
  • Strengthening the credit derivatives market in India
  • Supporting more effective credit risk management in the corporate bond market

3. Introduction of New Credit Derivative Instruments

The draft framework seeks to enable:

  • Derivatives on credit indices, and
  • Total Return Swaps (TRS) on corporate bonds

These instruments are expected to:

  • Provide market participants with additional tools for hedging and risk transfer
  • Enhance market depth and liquidity
  • Facilitate more efficient price discovery

4. Consolidation of Existing Credit Derivatives Framework

The revised Master Direction also aims to:

  • Consolidate provisions relating to credit derivatives into a single framework
  • Integrate and update existing directions on Credit Default Swaps (CDS)
  • Remove overlaps and improve regulatory clarity

This consolidation is intended to provide a comprehensive and streamlined regulatory reference for all credit derivative instruments.

5. Strengthening the Corporate Bond Market

By revising and expanding the credit derivatives framework, the RBI seeks to:

  • Improve credit risk distribution and management
  • Enhance liquidity and efficiency in the corporate bond market
  • Support the development of a more resilient and mature financial market ecosystem

6. Key Takeaway

The draft revised Master Direction marks a significant step towards:

  • Broadening India’s credit derivatives landscape
  • Aligning regulatory norms with market evolution
  • Encouraging stakeholder participation through consultation

Market participants are encouraged to review the draft and submit comments within the prescribed timeline.

Click Here To Read The Full Press Release

The post RBI Proposes Credit Index Derivatives Framework appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Booking of Flats Without Agreement Can’t Trigger PCM Revenue | ITAT

Booking of Flats Without Agreement

Case Details: SNN Spiritua Developer vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - [2026] 183 taxmann.com 43 (Bangalore-Trib.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Soundararajan K., Judicial Member & Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member
  • Ramakrishna Kamat, CA for the Appellant.
  • Muthu Shankar, CIT (DR) for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee was a partnership firm and a sister concern of the SNN group, which was engaged in the real estate business. The assessee filed its return of income for the relevant assessment year, reporting income to tax of Rs. 1,49,35,860.

A search and seizure action under section 132 was carried out in the case of some entities, including the assessee. In response to the notice issued under section 153C, the assessee failed to file a return of income. Consequently, the Assessing Officer (AO) passed an order under section 144 and computed the income by rejecting the assessee’s revenue recognition method.

The matter reached the Bangalore Tribunal.

ITAT Held

The Tribunal held that it was not in dispute that the assessee follows Accounting Standard 9 issued by ICAI read with the Guidance Note on Accounting for Real Estate Transactions. As per the said standard and guidance note, revenue can be recognised only when all significant risks and rewards of ownership are transferred. Such transfer is to be examined with reference to legally enforceable agreements and not merely on the basis of bookings or receipt of advances.

In the instant case, certain flats were merely booked during the year by receipt of token advances, and agreements for sale in respect of those flats were executed only in subsequent years. Mere booking of flats, without execution of a written and enforceable agreement, does not result in the transfer of significant risks and rewards. Therefore, the same cannot form the basis for recognising revenue under the Percentage Completion Method (PCM).

Further, paragraph 5.3 of the Guidance Note mandates that at least 10 per cent of the agreement value as per legally enforceable documents must be realised at the reporting date in respect of each flat. The assessee furnished a separate table showing flats that the AO included for revenue recognition, even though the amount realised as of the reporting date was less than the prescribed 10 per cent of the agreement value. These facts have not been disputed by the Revenue.

The AO’s approach of treating booking advances as equivalent to contracts merely because the booked area and consideration could be identified is not in accordance with the Guidance Note. The ability to estimate consideration or receipt of advances cannot substitute the mandatory requirement of a legally enforceable agreement or fulfil the specific conditions prescribed for revenue recognition.

The post Booking of Flats Without Agreement Can’t Trigger PCM Revenue | ITAT appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Union Budget 2026 – Transformative Changes in Transfer Pricing

Union Budget 2026 transfer pricing changes

Vinita Chakrabarti & Vaishali Amin – [2026] 183 taxmann.com 226 (Article)

1. Introduction

In an economic landscape defined by heightened geopolitical uncertainty, and rapidly evolving global value chains, the Union Budget 2026 marks a pivotal moment for the country’s transfer pricing (TP) framework. The proposals span a wide spectrum — from a comprehensive recast of the Safe Harbour (SH) rules to a more streamlined and time-bound Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) regime, as well as long-needed clarity on assessment timelines and the codification of the 60 day rule. Collectively, these measures illustrate the Government’s intent to upgrade TP administration and better align it with global developments. The reforms are particularly relevant to India’s IT/ITES industry and expanding Global Capability Centres (GCCs), that have consistently sought tax certainty and simplification in operational and compliance processes. This article explores the key TP amendments introduced through the Finance Bill 2026 and analyses their practical ramifications for multinational enterprises operating in India.

2. A New Era for the Safe Harbour Regime

2.1 Unified Approach – Integrating ‘IT Services’

The Honorable Finance Minister in her Budget speech 2026, proposed significant revisions to India’s SH Regulations, with a particular focus on the ‘IT services’.

The SH Regulations, first introduced by the Central Board of Direct Taxes in 2013 (Rules 10TA to 10TG of the Income tax Rules, 1962), were envisioned as a dispute mitigation mechanism. Under this framework, tax authorities agree to accept the transfer price declared by taxpayers for specified international transactions, provided certain pre-defined conditions are met. This mechanism aimed to reduce litigation, lower compliance burdens and provide much needed certainty by limiting exhaustive documentation requirements.

The SH Regulations primarily cover standardised transactions such as software development services, IT enabled services (‘ITeS’), knowledge process outsourcing (‘KPO’), Contract Research & Development (R&D) in software and pharmaceuticals, manufacturing and export of core/non-core automotive components, corporate guarantees, intra-group loans and low value adding service.

Over time, the regime’s perceived higher margins and the complexity of service classifications limited its attractiveness and consequent adoption by taxpayers. Recognising these challenges, the Government rationalised margins and increased thresholds nominally in 2017, broadening the scope to make the regime more relevant and accessible, particularly for smaller taxpayers. Despite these efforts, the uptake remained modest, as stakeholders continued to seek lower SH rates, broader eligibility and higher thresholds to truly unlock the framework’s potential for reducing disputes and easing compliance.

Taking into account various recommendations made through industry bodies and forums, Finance Bill 2026 proposals have decisively addressed longstanding industry concerns by introducing sweeping reforms to the SH Regulations.

Most notably, Finance Bill 2026 has proposed a uniform consolidated SH margin of 15.5% covering multiple categories, i.e. ITES, KPO, software development services, contract R&D relating to software development services, significantly lower than the originally prescribed rates ranging from 20 to 29 % (2013 to 2016), which were later reduced to 17% to 24% (2017 onward), coupled with a major increase in the eligibility threshold from INR 300 crores to INR 2,000 crores. Furthermore, allowing taxpayers to opt for the same SH margin for up to five consecutive years brings a level of certainty and stability that the industry has long been seeking.

These changes are set to eliminate much of the ambiguity surrounding the classification of IT, ITeS and KPO services, streamlining the framework for taxpayers. As a result, SH is poised to become a genuinely viable option for a far broader spectrum of mid-sized and even large IT service providers.

Equally transformative is the introduction of an automated, rule-based approval mechanism, which removes the need for scrutiny or acceptance by a tax officer.

2.2 New Category Introduced – Data Centre Services

India continues to rank among the highest in AI adoption across the Asia-Pacific region, and its data-centre capacity is projected to triple to nearly 4.5?GW by 2030. With abundant datasets, a large and digitally engaged population, and deep engineering talent, India is strongly positioned to scale AI and cloud infrastructure. This potential has already been recognised by global technology leaders—Amazon and Microsoft which announced huge investments totaling to approximately US$52?billion in next 4 to 5 years, further accelerating India’s transformation into a hyperscale digital infrastructure hub.

Acknowledging this momentum and the need to attract global investment while strengthening critical digital infrastructure, the Finance Bill 2026 placed significant strategic emphasis on positioning India as a global centre for cloud, AI, and hyperscale data centre capability. In line with this objective, the Budget introduced a 20 year tax holiday (until 2047) for foreign companies offering cloud services globally, provided such services are delivered through data centres located in India and Indian customers are served through a domestic reseller entity.

These proposals have been positively received by industry bodies and taxpayers, who believe they will additional have/generate a multiplier effect on the economy. To illustrate, the sentiment echoed by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, who praised the policy direction and highlighted its broader economic impact, noting that large scale development of data centres in India could replicate the internet era job boom by creating extensive upstream and downstream employment opportunities.

The Finance Bill 2026, further to achieve transfer pricing certainty proposes a 15% safe harbour margin, by introducing a newcategory under the SHR for cloud-linked data-center services rendered to overseas AE(s), where the foreign enterprise uses those services to provide cloud solutions to international customers.

2.3 Positive Boost to Home-Grown Accounting and Advisory Firms

It is proposed to rationalise the definition of ‘accountant’ for the purposes of SH Regulations, thereby enabling more local firms to issue certificates as required under these regulations.

Click Here To Read The Full Article

The post Union Budget 2026 – Transformative Changes in Transfer Pricing appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

ITC Re-demand on STP De-bonding – Appeal Under Section 107 Allowed | HC

ITC on IGST

Case Details: Dar Al Handasah Consultants (Shair and Partners) India (P) Ltd. vs. Union of India [2026] 182 taxmann.com 821 (Bombay)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • G. S. Kulkarni & Aarti Sathe, JJ.
  • Prakash Shah, Sr. Adv., Jas SanghaviSuyog Bhave for the Petitioner.
  • Ram OchaniSuman Kumar DasAshutosh MishraMs Shruti D. Vyas, Addl. G.P. & Aditya R. Deolekar, AGP for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner was engaged in the export of engineering services. It imported capital goods in the past and lawfully claimed exemption under Chapter 6 of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP). Subsequently, it filed an application to exit the Software Technology Park (STP) scheme and to de-bond the capital goods imported earlier. While exiting, it was required to pay the applicable customs duty, along with IGST. The petitioner availed the IGST amount as ITC in its Electronic Credit Ledger. Later, the petitioner was served with a show cause notice that the tax paid for debonding did not fall under input tax and was not eligible as ITC. The petitioner filed a reply to the notice, denying its liability to pay the amounts demanded. However, the authority passed an Order-in-Original confirming the proposal of demand under the show cause notice. Aggrieved by the order, the petitioner filed a writ petition to the Bombay High Court.

High Court Held

The Court held that the petitioner was to be allowed to file an appeal in respect of the disputed amounts. The petitioner was allowed to file an appeal within six weeks before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals).

The post ITC Re-demand on STP De-bonding – Appeal Under Section 107 Allowed | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Updates

Seeking stakeholders' input on the proposed Income-tax Rules and related Forms relating to the Income Tax Act, 2025

Details :

​​

Publish Date : Sunday, February 8, 2026
Attachments :
1. https://incometaxindia.gov.in/Lists/Press Releases/Attachments/1236/Seeking-stakeholders-input-on-the-proposed-Income-tax-Rules-and-related-Forms-relating-to-the-Income-Tax-Act25.pdf

source

Categories
Blog Updates

SEBI Mandates Upload of AIF NAV for Each ISIN via RTAs

SEBI AIF NAV upload requirement

Circular no. HO/19/34/11(8)2025-AFD-POD1/I/4335/2026; Dated: 06.02.2026

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has directed Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) to upload the latest Net Asset Value (NAV) for each ISIN of AIF units in the depository system, through their respective Registrars to an Issue and Share Transfer Agents (RTAs).

This measure is aimed at improving transparency, data accuracy, and market-wide availability of AIF valuation information.

1. Timeline for Uploading NAV

The NAV data must be uploaded:

  • On or before 1 May 2026, or
  • Within 30 days from the valuation date of the investment portfolio,
    whichever is later.

AIFs are required to ensure adherence to this timeline for each ISIN.

2. Determination of Valuation Date

For the purpose of computing the 30-day period, the valuation date shall be determined as follows:

2.1 Valuation by Independent Valuer

  • The date of the valuation report issued by the independent valuer.

2.2 Valuation by Internal Valuer

  • The date on which the valuation is documented in the internal records of the fund.

3. Responsibility of the AIF Manager

SEBI has clarified that:

  • The AIF manager shall be responsible for ensuring timely and accurate uploading of the NAV data.
  • Accountability for correctness and compliance rests with the manager, even though the upload is routed through RTAs.

4. Effective Date

  • The provisions of this circular come into force with immediate effect.

AIFs, managers, and RTAs are expected to align their valuation, reporting, and system processes accordingly.

5. Key Takeaway

The directive:

  • Enhances transparency and consistency in AIF NAV reporting
  • Strengthens data availability in the depository ecosystem
  • Places clear accountability on AIF managers for compliance
Click Here To Read The Full Circular

The post SEBI Mandates Upload of AIF NAV for Each ISIN via RTAs appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

Categories
Blog Updates

Retrospective GST Amendment in SCN Questioned – Recovery Stayed | HC

retrospective amendment Section 17(5)(d)

Case Details: Life Line Multi- Ventures (P.) Ltd. vs. Union of India [2026] 182 taxmann.com 635 (Orissa)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Harish Tandon, CJ. & Murahari Sri Raman, J.
  • Rudra Prasad Kar, Sr. Adv. & Sriman Arpeet Mohanty, Adv. for the Petitioner.
  • Sunil Mishra, Standing Counsel & Mukesh Agarwal, Junior Standing Counsel for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, a private limited company, filed a writ petition before the Orissa High Court to question the legality of the show-cause notice (SCN) issued in Form GST DRC-01. The SCN was issued, under Section 73 of the Odisha Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (OGST Act) for the tax periods from April 2021 to March 2022. The petitioner contended that the SCN was not sustainable as it sought to apply an amendment to Section 17(5)(d) introduced by the Finance Act 2025. The amendment was brought into force in Section 17(5)(d) by virtue of the Finance Act 2025, whereby for the words “plant or machinery”, the words “plant and machinery” were substituted. Further, the SCN was issued in connection with and in pursuance of an audit report furnished under Section 65 of the OGST Act, which is hit by the period of limitation provided therein. The Department contended that the matter was taken up for the first time for the entertainment of the writ petition. The audit was completed on 02-07-2025, and the order under Section 73 of the OGST Act was passed on 05-12-2025. Thus, the legality of the SCN cannot be examined in the present writ petition.

High Court Held

The Orissa High Court held that the SCN could not be issued to determine tax liability for the relevant period when the amendment to Section 17(5)(d) was brought in by virtue of the Finance Act 2025 and the OGST (Amendment) Act 2025. The amendment to Section 17(5)(d) was notified after the issuance of the SCN. Therefore, the transactions for the relevant period could not be questioned by such SCN. The Court was of the prima facie view that the authority could not issue the SCN to apply the amendments introduced after the issuance of the SCN. The question of the retrospectivity of the amendment was raised. The Court was inclined to entertain this writ petition to consider whether the SCN itself was validly issued and the authority could proceed to adjudicate based on the audit report submitted after the stipulated period. Therefore, the matter was admitted, and the authority was restrained from proceeding with the recovery of demand raised until the next date.

The post Retrospective GST Amendment in SCN Questioned – Recovery Stayed | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source