[Opinion] Taxing the Intangible – India’s Evolving Stance on Virtual PE

Ashish Chadha – [2026] 186 taxmann.com 44 (Article)

1. Introduction

The concept of a permanent establishment (‘PE’), as embodied in Article 5 of most tax treaties, was developed in an economic context dominated by traditional, asset-heavy business models. These provisions were framed at a time when commercial presence was largely synonymous with physical presence i.e., premises, personnel and tangible infrastructure.

The rapid evolution of the digital economy has far outpaced corresponding developments in international tax frameworks. In response to this structural lag, Indian tax authorities have sought to expand the scope of taxation of foreign enterprises operating in digital and technology-enabled business models. One such attempt has been the invocation of the relatively novel and controversial concept of a “virtual permanent establishment”.

This article reviews key judicial developments relating to the concept of virtual PE, with specific reference to India, where the tax authorities have consistently sought to test the limits of Article 5 through expansive interpretation.

2. Virtual PE as a BEPS – Era Construct

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (‘OECD’), in its Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (‘BEPS’) Action Plan, specifically Action Plan 1 addressing the tax challenges of the digital economy, has acknowledged the conceptual underpinnings of a “virtual PE”. However, the OECD has been clear in its position that the introduction of such a concept would require explicit tax treaty amendments.

To date, notwithstanding the Multilateral Instrument (‘MLI’) and ongoing Pillar One discussions, meaningful treaty-level adoption of a virtual PE framework remains limited. Consequently, in the absence of express treaty language, the legal sustainability of unilateral interpretations by tax authorities of a jurisdiction remains open to challenge.

3. Judicial Evolution of the Virtual PE Debate in India

The Indian tax authorities began exploring expansive interpretations of PE concepts well before the BEPS initiative. In an early ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) held that computers installed at the premises of Indian travel agents constituted a fixed place PE of a foreign enterprise providing a computerized reservation system (CRS).

However, this approach did not find consistent judicial support. In a subsequent decision, the ITAT clarified that a website, by itself, does not constitute a fixed place PE, marking an early judicial recognition of the distinction between physical infrastructure and digital interfaces.